Arwen276: Patient, aren't we?
Lovers4ever: I cannot say enough how much I absolutely love this fic of yours. It simply isn't possible. You capture the emotions of our two girls beautifully: Each is mourning for the loss of the other and yet at the same time are trying to define their "new" relationship. I absolutely love it.
I also deeply admire your courage, as this is relatively uncharted territory that you're writing into: The only fics that I can think of that rival this one in emotional intensity, quality of writing
and story/character development are
The Dark Rose by
DarkMagickWillow,
Tempus Fugit (S7) by
lipkandy,
Doppelganger Redux by
technopagan78,
Paths Diverged/Divulged by
JustSkipIt (and at least one other fic, the name of which eludes me at the moment) -- except for the fact that in said fics, only Willow has witnessed Tara's death and not the other way around -- and
Hotel Kilo 2-2 by
jixer: A fic in which both Willow and Tara have seen their respective lovers killed, except that in the end the "old" Tara was reunited with the "old" Willow. So, really, the concept of the two lovers who are both grieving for the other's double and yet attracted to each other romantically has never been fully brought to fruition. I eagerly await to see how you will explore this new territory.

Oh, and btw, about Tara being pregenant: HUH???

Say that again? Oh. Ok. HUUUUH???




How'd
THAT happen???
Were Willow and Tara not practicing safe sex again?

Well, if it IS both Willow and Tara's, then we know that our two girls will soon become our three girls


(y'know, because of the whole "double "X" chromisome" thingy)
Anyways, that's enough out of my blow hole. How about you shut me up with, say, an update?



Thanks for writing your wonderful stuff, and also for reading my fluffy (if well intentioned) praise of said wonderful stuff

Bye!
(edited [12/16/03 at 6:03 pm] because, as Jenpurr pointed out, I can't keep track of all the authors that I cited
)(edited AGAIN [12/23/03 at 4:36 am] to say that I spent 4 hours working on a rudamentary (relatively so, considering that I was doing my work on paper and then transcribing it to an Excel file and not using any REALLY fancy probability techniques about which i have no clue whatsoever) mathematical proof stating that you would update today (well, yesterday now), but you haven't, and now I'm stuck on the fourth point out of the five and forget the seventh cause you can't have seven without six and you sure as heckfire can't have it without five, and...
and I'll shut up now 
for any of you math geniuses out there who's kind interested by my insane babbling and would like to take a look at my proof and point out my mistake, give me a buzz and I'll explain in what I hope will be a semi-coherent fashion
) ---------------------------------
There she is! There she is... ahh... Not so wounded as we were led to believe... So much the better. --Khan, "Star Trek II: WOK"
From The Land of Tolerance,
---The Texan Zeppo
Edited by: TexanZeppo256 at: 12/24/03 4:36 am