Skip to content


GLBT News

The place for kittens to discuss GLBT (gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgendered) issues as well as topics that don't fit in the other forums. (Some topics are off-topic in every forum on the board. Please read the FAQs.)

Another evil lesbian

Postby Shadow ALH » Wed Nov 27, 2002 3:59 pm

I hope this is the right place to post this.



Just saw this on PlanetOut:

www.planetout.com/pno/splash.html



by Romeo San Vicente

November 27, 2002







"Smallville" goes Sapphic



"Queers love the WB's drama "Smallville" because of its main character -- a young, hunky and occasionally shirtless Clark Kent (Tom Welling), a high school student harboring a secret that makes him different from the rest of the student body. But now "Smallville" is getting what every WB series needs -- a lesbian plotline. The lovely Lana Lange (Kristen Kreuk) will become the object of the series' first same-sex crush in an upcoming episode, currently titled "Visage." Rumor has it the plot focuses on a mysterious friend from Lana's past who returns to town after deciding she wants to be Lana's lesbo love. Using the paranormal powers given to her during Smallville's meteor shower, Lana's special friend will go to great lengths to get some girl-girl action."



Anyway, looks like there is going to be another evil lesbian coming to tv. My little sister watches Smallvile, so I've seen a couple of episodes when I go home to visit. In every episode I've seen the character they bring in for the show is somehow bad. Isn't that just great?



~Andrea





Shadow ALH
 


GLBT News: Alum's past hinders Philly school naming

Postby skittles » Sat Nov 30, 2002 8:18 am

Ok, I'm sorry. This news story got me a little mad, especially the idea that you shouldn't name a school after someone because they were gay. (look in the middle of the article) Arrgghhh!!!



Alum's past hinders Philly school naming



CNN news article link



District questions honor for gay, conscientious objector



Wednesday, November 27, 2002 Posted: 8:27 AM EST (1327 GMT)



WEST CHESTER, Pennsylvania (AP) -- When Bayard Rustin died in 1987, President Reagan said the civil rights activist who organized the 1963 rally at which Martin Luther King gave his "I Have a Dream" speech had "won the undying love of all who cherish freedom."



But that love apparently has limits in Rustin's hometown.



School board officials in West Chester are reconsidering their decision to name a new high school after Rustin following complaints from some board members that they had been unaware he was a conscientious objector during World War II, and that he was gay.



"His avoidance of any service during the Second World War doesn't sit very well with a lot of veterans," said former school board member Irl M. Duling, 73, who has gathered 500 signatures on a petition to find another name. "That has bothered some people, as have some other things about his personal life."



Those sentiments have created a sharp divisions in the Philadelphia suburb where Rustin grew up and graduated from high school in 1931.



Nearly 500 people turned out for a meeting last week after the West Chester Area School Board agreed to revisit its decision to put his name on a planned $67 million school. A majority were there to speak in favor of the lifelong activist.



"There is simply no other graduate of our school system who has had as much influence on our nation, or has had such a positive influence," school board member Thomas Wolpert said.

Rights, rides and resistance



Few dispute Rustin's impact on the civil rights struggle.



He joined the first Freedom Ride to fight segregation in 1947 -- an act that led to his being jailed for 30 days in North Carolina. In 1955, he was one of King's key aides during the Montgomery, Alabama, bus boycott that became a landmark civil rights victory. He followed that by organizing the march on Washington, where King made history with his speech at the Lincoln Memorial.



But for some critics, his accomplishments haven't made up for Rustin's refusal during World War II to register for the draft.



As a lifelong Quaker and a pacifist, Rustin wasn't obligated to serve in the military, but he drew a three-year jail term in 1943 when he also refused to perform alternative service in a non-combat role.



There has also been grumbling about Rustin's decision in 1936 to join the Young Communist League in New York. Five years later, he left the communists, saying, "It was inescapably clear that I had been wrong," but the break wasn't clean enough to satisfy some.



"If you combine his instigating other people not to serve in the military, along with the communist activities, it adds up to un-American activities," said June Cardosi, a West Chester Area School District board member.



Decision deadline



She said she also had misgivings about naming the school after someone who was openly gay.



Rustin was persecuted throughout his life for being homosexual, and was arrested at least once on morality charges after police spotted him in a romantic encounter with another man. At the time, homosexual behavior was illegal in many states.



A special committee has given itself until February to decide whether to name the building after Rustin or pick someone else. Construction on the school has yet to begin.



Supporters note that Rustin has been honored many times elsewhere, with no controversy.



His portrait hangs in the National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C. New York City named a high school after him, and West Chester named a pair of basketball courts after him in 1996.



end of article

skittles



"....in the noisy confusion of life, keep peace in your soul.

With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world.

Be cheerful. Strive to be happy." -- from Desiderata, Max Ehrmann, 1927

skittles
 


GLBT News - American Law Institute urges Family Law update

Postby FlereImsaho » Sat Nov 30, 2002 4:34 pm

Just read this in the New York Times. You have to register to read their articles online, but there is no charge.

Legal Group Urges States to Update Their Family Law



Here are a few excerpts:

Quote:
An influential group of lawyers and judges has recommended sweeping changes in family law that would increase alimony and property rights for many divorced women, while extending such rights for the first time to many cohabiting domestic partners, both heterosexual and gay.

...

The findings are likely to have a major impact, given the prestige of the institute, a private organization of eminent lawyers, judges and legal scholars that has had immense influence on the development of American law since the group was founded in 1923.

...

The report says that a parent's sexual orientation should not be a factor in decisions on child custody, and that domestic partnerships should be treated like marriage in many important respects.



In handling custody disputes, some judges still assume that gays are unfit to be parents. But the American Law Institute declares, "Homosexual conduct, like heterosexual extramarital conduct, should be disregarded unless shown to be harmful to an individual child." Judges, it says, should not be swayed by stereotypes or "prejudicial attitudes.

...

The institute's proposals would expand the number of people who can claim custody of a child or visitation rights. Such claims could be made not only by the legal parents, but also by a "de facto parent," defined as an individual who has lived with the child at least two years and "regularly performed a majority of the caretaking functions" without being paid.



For example, the report said, the lesbian partner of a child's biological mother may, in some circumstances, be able to assert a right to custody or visitation when the relationship between the women ends.






Of course we have a long ways to go, but this is encouraging. Our poor Attorney General though, I imagine he will be most upset by this!

FlereImsaho
 


Supreme Court agrees to hear sodomy case

Postby BBOvenGuy » Mon Dec 02, 2002 1:45 pm

From Yahoo!News



Quote:
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court said Monday it would consider whether states can punish homosexuals for having sex, a case that tests the constitutionality of sodomy laws in 13 states.



The justices will review the prosecution of two men under a 28-year-old Texas law making it a crime to engage in same-sex intercourse.



The Supreme Court has struggled with how much protection the Constitution offers in the bedroom. The court ruled 5-4 in 1986 that consenting adults have no constitutional right to private homosexual sex, upholding laws that ban sodomy.



"Gay men and lesbians have been waiting for the opportunity to convince the court it should take a different view of their constitutional rights," Ruth E. Harlow, legal director of the New York-based Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, said Monday.



The court faces several questions in the latest case. Among them: Is it an unconstitutional invasion of privacy for couples to be prosecuted for what they do in their own homes? Is it unconstitutional for states to treat gays and lesbians differently by punishing them for having sex while allowing heterosexual couples to engage in the same acts without penalties?



Sodomy is defined as abnormal sex, in some states including anal and oral sex. Nine states ban consensual sodomy for everyone: Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah and Virginia. In addition, Texas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma punish only homosexual sodomy.



States argue that the laws, some dating back more than 100 years, are intended to preserve public morals. The laws are rarely enforced.



Lawyers for John Geddes Lawrence and Tyron Garner said the men were bothering no one in 1998 when they were arrested in Lawrence's apartment, jailed overnight and later fined under Texas' Homosexual Conduct Law, which classifies anal or oral sex between two men or two women as deviate sexual intercourse.



The men's lawyers said the convictions would prevent them from getting certain jobs, and would in some states require them to register as sex offenders. They were arrested after police responded to a false report of an armed intruder in Lawrence's apartment. Police entered the unlocked apartment and found the men having sex.



Lawrence and Garner were fined $200 after pleading no contest to misdemeanor charges.



"The idea that a state may enter into American bedrooms and closely inspect the most intimate and private physical interactions ... is a stark affront to fundamental liberty that the court should end," said Harlow, one of the men's lawyers.



Harlow said in court filings that the latest census found more than 600,000 households of same-sex partners in America, including about 43,000 in Texas. She said the Texas law treats gays as second-class citizens.



William Delmore III, an assistant district attorney in Texas, said people who don't like the law should take it up with the Texas Legislature, not courts.



He said homosexual sodomy has been considered criminal behavior for centuries. The conduct "could not conceivably have achieved the status of a fundamental right in the brief period of 16 years" since the Supreme Court last reviewed it, Delmore wrote in the state's court papers.



Over the past decade, state courts have blocked sodomy laws in Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Montana, and Tennessee. A Louisiana appeals court recently upheld that state's 197-year-old law banning all oral and anal sex.



Delmore said the Texas law does not just target gays and lesbians. He said it also could be used for bisexuals and heterosexuals "who are tempted to engage in homosexual conduct." The law is part of Texas' "communal belief that the conduct is wrong and should be discouraged," he wrote in a filing.



In a brief supporting Texas, the California-based Pro Family Law Center said states should be given leeway to protect the public from the spread of diseases like AIDS (news - web sites).



Civil rights groups including the Human Rights Campaign urged the court to intervene, saying the laws are responsible for "stigmatizing gays and lesbians as outlaws" and "contribute to an atmosphere of hatred and violence" against gays.



The case is Lawrence v. Texas, 02-102.




This should be very interesting, because the conservatives on the Supreme Court will have to balance two conflicting issues - their desire to uphold what they consider to be "sexual morality" vs. their desire to limit the government's ability to meddle in people's lives. If one of the "swing votes" on the Court goes the right way, it could be an end to sodomy laws. Let's hope so...

------------------------------------------------
"A man who fails well is greater than one who succeeds badly. - Thomas Merton

BBOvenGuy
 


GLBT News: Canada Customs Does It Again

Postby Patches » Mon Dec 02, 2002 8:38 pm

Reading the posts in this thread, kinda thinking to myself how grateful I was that I don’t have to deal with the kind of issues and obstacles my southern neighbours have had to and are still facing. I’m lucky; the anti-sodomy and most blatantly homophobic laws in Canada were stuck down when I was young and what we’re fighting for now isn’t decriminalisation but full equality under the law.



We’re not there yet, but I’d always thought that Canada was well on its way to giving us fully integrated and equal rights. I kinda thought that we were becoming an open, accepting and normalizing country. I could live with the right-wing religious and political nut bars; they’ve always been their own worst enemy. I felt secure in the victories we had won, I felt protected under the law. I felt that being queer wasn’t really so bad after all. Three weeks ago, the one of the headline news stories was “Canada to lead the world in promoting gay adoption rights;” our Supreme Court is opening the door for full marriage rights – we were quickly catching up to our European cousins on the other side of the pond; life seemed to be pretty good for queers in Canada.



The bubble burst this afternoon when I read Why Sally Can’t Read in the new December issue of Girlfriends Home Page. Seems we can have (almost) all the rights we want on paper, but not even the Rule of Law (the principle that no one in a democracy should be above the law) protects us from homophobic, narrow-minded simpletons ‘defending’ our ‘sensibilities’ at the border.



Canada Customs employees have taken upon themselves the mantel of ‘defenders of morality’ – ya, their own heterosexual morality! They have set themselves above the law, at a whim can choose what we may or may not read/view/hear. People who know nothing about us, about or lives and our love have the right to decide what is good for us. It doesn’t matter that the highest Court in the land has told them to keep their hands off our books, they just go merrily along as if the Court didn’t exist and all that matters is what they think is “good” for us. I can’t believe it! I really can’t describe how angry I am at this, and how hurt. Why can’t they just leave us the @#*& alone?



To the other Canadian Kittens out here in cyber-space, maybe we all need to hit our Federal MP’s up for an explanation. What gives Canada Customs employees the right to ignore the Supreme Court and to deny us our culture?



Patches
 


Re: Supreme Court agrees to hear sodomy case

Postby FlereImsaho » Mon Dec 02, 2002 8:40 pm

We could certainly use some good news, but it's hard to be hopeful with this court. These are the same justices who circumvented their claimed bias towards states rights when they made Bush the president. I'm afraid that they will vote the way they want to, then justify it however they choose. "Conservatives" claim to want smaller and less government to minimize interference in our lives, but then they pass laws regulating what people do in their bedrooms. It's just so wrong, why can't they see it?



Sorry for the mini-rant, I don't want to be so negative. I would prefer to believe that the court is really considering changing its prior decisions. Just the fact that they agreed to hear the case could be a good sign. Really there's not much downside. They will either uphold the status quo, which we've already lived with for what seems like forever, or they could toss in the trash unfair laws that were built on and support prejudice. This could help a lot of people. It would an ironic victory, coming from these justices. It would be especially nice to have the Texas law overturned!



Thanks for posting this interesting article.

FlereImsaho
 


Gays "To get same rights as marrieds"

Postby walker » Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:01 am

From the BBC



------------------------------------



Gay men, lesbians and bisexuals are to be offered the same rights as married couples, the Government has said.



Barbara Roche, the minister for social exclusion and equalities, said there was a strong case for allowing same-sex couples to register their relationships.



Gay partners could gain property and inheritance rights for the first time.



Shadow home secretary Oliver Letwin has signalled the Tories would support the measure when legislation is introduced.



----------------------------------------------



I know this one has been about for a while but as they've made it leading story on the news again I thought I'd bring it up. For me the interesting part of the article is the comment at the end by Oliver Letwin. It seems that, after being humiliated by their party voting against them despite the three line whip for the vote on gay adoption, the tory party are now going to roll over on this one. Or I could be being entirely too cynical and the Conservatives have had a change of policy on gay issues in the last month. I would love it if they had because the biggest party of the right in this country changing its policy to accept the equality of gay people really would be progress.

"See, that's where you're a dummy. I think about what you grew up with, and then I look at what you are. It makes me proud. It makes me love you more." - Willow

walker
 


Brandon Teena lawsuit

Postby Pipsqueak » Sat Dec 07, 2002 5:53 pm

I found the following on E!Online's "First Look" page:



Quote:
DENIED: The Nebraska Supreme Court on Friday rejecting a bid to increase the damage award to the mother of Teena Brandon, the cross-dressing woman whose murder was the subject of 1999's powerful drama Boys Don't Cry.




Can anyone else confirm this? I haven't found the news on any other sites, but then again, I might not be looking in the right places.

"Skin mags! Skin mags!" -- Amber Benson

Pipsqueak
 


Re: Brandon Teena lawsuit

Postby FlereImsaho » Sat Dec 07, 2002 7:06 pm

Google has a news search page that seems to work pretty well. There were 141 hits on "Teena Brandon" a few minutes ago. I checked one of those hits, the Omaha World Herald, and it confirmed what you found on E!Online.



Here is a link to the search results.

news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=%22Teena+Brandon%22&btnG=Google+Search

FlereImsaho
 


Re: Brandon Teena lawsuit

Postby Pipsqueak » Sat Dec 07, 2002 9:25 pm

Thanks for that, Flerelmsaho! duh! I tried Google but didn't know they had a special "news" search. Me stupid.



Looks like they're still referring to him as a "cross-dressing woman". Sigh. :rolleyes

"Skin mags! Skin mags!" -- Amber Benson

Pipsqueak
 


Re: Brandon Teena lawsuit

Postby FlereImsaho » Sun Dec 08, 2002 12:48 am

Google's news search is a new feature, so name calling!



This story is so sad. There are things that I will never understand.

FlereImsaho
 


Re: Supreme Court

Postby DaffyQDuck » Sun Dec 08, 2002 1:12 am

I'm going to try to put a link here, since pasting didn't work, to a cartoon from Slate.com, I hope it works.

www.cagle.com/working/021204/cagle00.gif







It wasn't our world anymore, they made it theirs and they had fun - Willow

Edited by: DaffyQDuck at: 12/7/02 11:17:25 pm
DaffyQDuck
 


Re: Supreme Court

Postby FlereImsaho » Sun Dec 08, 2002 2:04 am

Oh my god! LOL!!!



Thanks, I needed that.

FlereImsaho
 


Marvel Comics to unveil gay gunslinger

Postby Dave V » Tue Dec 10, 2002 7:13 am

The new Rawhide Kid

Quote:
NEW YORK (CNN) -- Marvel Comics plans to break new ground in the comic book industry by introducing the first openly gay title character in a comic book.



The character will appear in a revival of the 1950s title, "The Rawhide Kid." Marvel expects a February debut.



The new series pairs the original artist, John Severin, now 86, with Ron Zimmerman, a writer for the "Howard Stern Show."



The Rawhide Kid has been a Marvel character since the 1950s both as a main and a secondary character. However, it was not until Zimmerman approached Marvel with his idea of a homosexual Rawhide Kid that sexuality was mentioned in the discussion of the character.



Although shy with girls, the original Rawhide Kid was not intended to be gay. The new version uses double entendres and euphemisms to reveal his homosexuality without saying anything explicitly. Based on a blurb on Marvel's Web site, the tone may be campy.



In a bubble in the first edition of the series, Rawhide Kid comments about the Lone Ranger: "I think that mask and the powder blue outfit are fantastic. I can certainly see why the Indian follows him around."



Brian Reinert, Marvel's public relations officer, said that Marvel has always been "interested in tapping into stories that are relevant today." He expects the reactions to this comic to vary.



Although many readers will accept the new sexuality of the Marvel hero, Reinert expects possible negative responses from people who don't accept homosexuality and readers who do not want to see a change in their beloved character.



"When you tackle these issues it will always push buttons," he said.



Marvel is planning six stories over the next six months. After looking at the response to those issues they will decide whether to continue production and whether they would be interested in more series with gay title characters.



Although Rawhide Kid is the first gay title character, Marvel does have several existing gay characters, such as North Star of the "X-Men" comic book series.



The Rawhide Kid series, beginning with the first edition "Rawhide Kid: Slap Leather," will run about 22 pages and have a suggested retail price of $2.95.


So, he'll be gay without being "explicitly" gay. How forward. Still, it will be interesting to see the response to this comic book.

Edited by: Dave V at: 12/10/02 5:16:44 am
Dave V
 


Looks like the UK are starting to get things right

Postby Nix42 » Tue Dec 10, 2002 12:30 pm

From today's Guardian



Quote:
Transsexuals' rights victory after 30 years



Clare Dyer, legal correspondent

Tuesday December 10, 2002

The Guardian



Transsexuals are to be given the right to change their birth certificates and marry in their adopted sex, after a 30-year legal battle.

The lord chancellor, Lord Irvine, is poised to announce the change just weeks before a male-to-female transsexual was due to ask the House of Lords for a ruling that her 20-year marriage to a man was valid.



The move has been forced on ministers by a judgment last July from the European court of human rights in Strasbourg, holding that the UK law, which insists that gender is irrevocably established at birth, violates transsexuals' right to respect for private and family life.



The Strasbourg judges said: "A serious interference with private life arose from the conflict between social reality and law, which placed the transsexuals in an anomalous position in which they could experience feelings of vulnerability, humiliation and anxiety.



"In the 21st century the right of transsexuals to personal development and to physical and moral security in the full sense enjoyed by others in society can no longer be regarded as a matter of controversy requiring the lapse of time to cast clearer light on the issues involved."



The UK is one of four countries in Europe - with Albania, Andorra and Ireland - which still refuse to allow transsexuals to alter their birth certificates. The ban has barred them from marrying in their new sex, affected the age at which they qualify for a state pension and infringed their privacy by ensuring that their previous history is inevitably revealed to any new employer.



A month before the Strasbourg judgment, which the government expected to lose, a working group of officials from 12 government departments was reconvened to consider how to take reforms forward.



In a series of court cases judges have expressed sympathy for the plight of transsexuals, but said reform was a matter for parliament.



Elizabeth Bellinger, whose case is scheduled for hearing in the House of Lords next month, narrowly lost her case by a majority of two to one in the court of appeal in July 2000. Both judges who ruled against her called on the government to change the law.



Last July the Strasbourg court ruled in favour of Chris tine Goodwin, formerly a male bus driver, and another male-to-female transsexual named only as "I". Ms Goodwin claimed that the UK government violated her right to a private life and discriminated against her by making her wait until she was 65 for a state pension.



Ms I argued that her right to respect for her private life was breached because she had to produce a birth certificate showing her as male to register for a nursing course.



Stephen Whittle, of the transsexuals' campaigning group Press for Change, said: "I'm really pleased they're finally doing it. The fact that they're waiting nearly six months from the Strasbourg decision is appalling."



Dr Whittle, a female-to-male transsexual and law lecturer who has played a leading role in the campaign for transsexuals' rights, said the group was concerned that there might be loopholes in the new law and delays before it went on the statute book.



"There's no point in doing it if there are loopholes. The nature of the loopholes is what has caused trouble in the past.



"What I really want to know is that they're going to do it in the next session. Are they going to put in place more consultative processes because if they are we're on a hiding to nothing."



He said that one stumbling block was what should happen to people who had changed sex but remained within existing marriages, in some cases for pension reasons. Ministers were divided on whether they should have to divorce if they wanted to change the sex on their birth certificates.



Christine Burns, of Press for Change, said: "It's vital that the proposals provide full legal recognition for all purposes. If there are any exceptions, it will be worthless."



Lynne Jones, Labour MP for Birmingham Selly Oak and chairwoman of the parliamentary forum on transsexualism, said: "I hope any measures the government introduces will get a fair wind in the Commons and the Lords and we'll start to catch up with more advanced countries."








You stole the sun from my heart

Nix42
 


A sign of the times: Lesbian students named 'cutest couple'

Postby skittles » Sun Dec 15, 2002 6:13 pm

Ok, this isn't the most important news item ever posted in this thread, but I felt that it was important. At least important enough to share with other kittens. And I'm happy about it!!!



A sign of the times: Lesbian students named 'cutest couple'



CNN News article



CRETE, Illinois (AP) -- Their story has played out like the name of a popular lesbian movie: "The Incredibly True Adventure of Two Girls in Love."



It started last month, when the girls -- longtime high school sweethearts -- were voted "cutest couple" by their fellow seniors at Crete-Monee High School in the suburbs south of Chicago.



Administrators balked, at first. Then several students walked out of class to support the girls.



It is a drama that, for a time anyway, awakened this sleepy town, lined with antique shops, churches and cafes, and still surrounded by corn fields.



In the end, the girls' parents -- though a bit shell-shocked -- agreed to let a photograph of the couple appear in the school yearbook.



And last week, district superintendent Roberta Berry wrote a letter praising the students at Crete-Monee High: "I am proud to say that while other schools continue to address issues such as alienation, bullying and hate crimes, we have a student body that not only accepts each others' differences, but also celebrates them."



Upset, some parents and community members have called to complain and written letters to the editor of local newspapers.



But others are supportive -- a sign, students say, that times are changing.



"This isn't 1952 anymore. I think people need to realize there are different people everywhere," says Rachel Urban, a 17-year-old Crete-Monee senior. "If 15- and 17-year-olds are mature enough to handle this, the rest of the country can."



There are other examples of students supporting their gay, lesbian and bisexual peers. In 1999, an openly gay high school student in San Anselmo, California, was elected homecoming king.



Meanwhile, students at an increasing number of schools are forming gay-straight alliances to support one another -- and more school districts are training teachers to work with gay students.



That's all happened at Waltham High School in Waltham, Mass., where school nurse Nancy Ryan oversees the gay-straight alliance. Still, she says, the school has a long way to go in helping its lesbian and gay students feel safe.



"I don't think they fear for their physical safety," she said. "But I think they still are hearing things that make them uncomfortable and make them afraid to come out."



It is, for example, still common for students at many schools to use the word "gay" to describe something they don't like. And "fag" remains a common slur, teachers and students say.



A 2002 report by the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network, a nationwide group of students, parents and teachers, notes that only nine states and the District of Columbia have some form of protection for students, based on sexual orientation and gender identity -- California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.



The lack of protection, students and others say, makes it that much harder to come out.



At Crete-Monee, officials and even students have chosen not to reveal the names of the "cutest couple" girls, whose parents didn't know they were dating until the vote.



"The girls are understandably overwhelmed and so are their families," school district spokeswoman Sue Rossi said.



Choosing senior "bests" is a long-standing tradition for Crete-Monee seniors. Each year, they cast their votes for everyone from the "most likely to succeed" to "most likely to shock us at our reunion."



While there were three or four senior couples who'd been together through a good chunk of high school, the majority voted for the girls.



Classmates say it was done with sincerity.



They say the girls -- popular students who are active in sports and other extracurricular activities -- can often be seen holding hands in the school's hallways.



"I think people voted for them because they're so open about their relationship -- and how good it is," says Danielle Cheatom, a 17-year-old senior. "They're actually in love and care about each other."



Adds Nick Renfroe, another 17-year-old senior: "They really are the cutest couple."



Renfroe was among about 60 students who protested last month outside the school, fearing that administrators would withhold the girls' photo from the yearbook.



Several students were suspended for two days for taking part in the protest.



Maris Formas, a 17-year-old senior, says the issue brought students to the forefront who'd never been class leaders before.



"The teachers are amazed at our dedication," she said. "I was, too."

skittles



"And laying his finger aside of his nose, giving a nod, up the chimney he rose...

... And I heard him exclaim, ere he drove out of sight, 'Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night!"

-- from A Visit from St. Nicholas, CCMoore

skittles
 


Re: A sign of the times: Lesbian students named 'cutest coup

Postby FlereImsaho » Sun Dec 15, 2002 7:32 pm

This is great skittles! Happy news is good, and we need more of it! It is nice to see progress.



I agree with you, this is important! Definitely worth sharing.



Thank-you.



-Brent

FlereImsaho
 


Church in Germany

Postby kukalaka » Mon Dec 16, 2002 5:07 am

I really liked reading about the "cutest couple", thanks for sharing.





There's lots of stuff happening in the German protestantic church at the moment:

German article



The EKD (Evangelical Church in Germany) had decided that blessings of same-sex partnerships didn't reflect the will of God. But the Landeskirchen (state churches?, there are 24 of those) of Berlin-Brandenburg, Pfalz and Hessen-Nassau have decided to do it anyway. ("We are not catholic, and Hannover is not the Vatican!") :grin



There is at least one priest openly living in a registered partnership.



And people are leaving the church because of this "violation of the laws of God". I don't think the church is losing much there, but I am worrying what those people are going to do next :





And I just found out that Berlin has actually passed a law (in 2001!) treating registered partnerships and marriages equally in all laws of Berlin. Maybe I'll just stay here and ignore the rest of the country/world ;)




Wenn Du denkst, Du denkst, dann denkst Du nur, Du denkst, denn beim Denken der Gedanken kommst Du nur auf den Gedanken, daß das Denken der Gedanken ein gedankenloses Denken ist.



kukalaka
 


On Eve of Vote, Gay Rights Bill Is Besieged From Within

Postby skittles » Mon Dec 16, 2002 1:38 pm

I prefer posting the cutest couple news items, too, but unfortunately, stuff like this intrudes all too frequently..... :(



From the NYTimes, dated December 16th (link at the bottom)



On Eve of Vote, Gay Rights Bill Is Besieged From Within

By SHAILA K. DEWAN



Tomorrow was supposed to be a shining moment for gay men and lesbians in the state. For the first time since a gay rights bill first surfaced in Albany 31 years ago, the State Senate plans to bring the measure to a vote, and the bill stands a chance of passing. Matt Foreman, the executive director of the Empire State Pride Agenda, called the long-awaited event "simply extraordinary for our community."



But at the 11th hour, dissent over the bill has caused some to question exactly who Mr. Foreman means when he says "our community."



The bill, which forbids discrimination in employment, housing, credit and public accommodations based on sexual orientation, and which has consistently been opposed by right-wing groups like the Conservative Party, is now under siege by those who feel that it does not go far enough because it does not explicitly protect transgendered people.



Those critics blame the Pride Agenda, the statewide lobbying group that has made passing the bill its top priority, for what they see as an inexcusable omission. By failing to work to amend the bill, they say, the Pride Agenda is marginalizing transgendered people just as society at large has marginalized homosexuals. In response, transgender groups have picketed the Pride Agenda's Manhattan office, and the dispute has led to open warfare between the Pride Agenda and State Senator Thomas K. Duane, the state's highest ranking openly gay politician.



"This is one of the most divisive things I've seen in my 30 years in the movement," said Allen Roskoff, who worked for Mayor David N. Dinkins's human rights commission and as a liaison to gay men, lesbians and transgendered people for Mark Green when Mr. Green was the public advocate. "There's an entire segment of the community that really feels that what ESPA is doing is really shameful. They have collected millions of dollars from within the community. If they're going to maintain that they are a civil rights organization, they're going to have to do more than pass a bare-essence bill that is 31 years overdue."



Housing Works, a major service provider for people with AIDS, is running radio commercials in Albany urging an amendment to the bill, which Senator Duane has vowed to introduce, and plans to send busloads of protesters to Albany tomorrow from New York City. Groups like the New York Transgender Coalition and the Metropolitan Gender Network, a transgender political club, have gone so far as to say that the bill, the Sexual Orientation Nondiscrimination Act, or Sonda, should not be passed without barring discrimination on the basis of "gender identity and expression" as well.



But some said they were torn. "I've been thinking about this over and over for weeks," said Diana Montford, a male-to-female transsexual who is active in the Democratic Party and is the host of a political talk show on a cable access channel. "Is half a loaf better than none? You see, I'm afraid that if it passes, they'll forget about us."



Mr. Foreman takes a pragmatic view, saying his organization has done the near-impossible by steering a gay rights bill — any gay rights bill — to the floor of the conservative Senate. "No one's denying that transgendered people need protection. We're certainly not," he said. "We're a political advocacy group. For us this isn't a morality play. This is about winning rights for people as quickly as we can."



But, he said, it was too late to change the bill, largely because Senator Joseph L. Bruno, the majority leader, had committed only to allow the existing version of the bill to go to the floor, and has suggested that even that is a one-time offer. The Assembly has repeatedly approved the bill in its current form. If the Senate passes Sonda tomorrow, Gov. George E. Pataki has said he will sign it into law.



"The notion that you just suddenly and quickly and easily insert a whole new protected category, and that the State Senate that has clearly been reluctant to act on this would just accept it blindly, is beyond naïve," Mr. Foreman said.



But others who have lobbied on the issue say that many lawmakers are surprised to learn that the bill does not cover the transgendered.



And some argue that anything short of inclusion is unacceptable. In an angry letter dated Dec. 10, Mr. Duane accused the Pride Agenda of "a string of missteps" that led to a failure to include transgendered people and complained that he had been excluded from lobbying meetings with Mr. Bruno. "This sends a horrible message to New Yorkers and is personally offensive to me, particularly since Senator Bruno expressed openness to transgender inclusion when I last spoke with him," Mr. Duane wrote.



But Sonda's supporters see Mr. Duane's stance as jeopardizing the gay rights bill. In recent weeks, he has refused to say whether he would vote for a bill that did not include the transgendered, and he enlisted the new Senate minority leader, David A. Paterson, in his cause.



Mr. Duane broke his silence only last Friday, when he acknowledged that his refusal to commit had been a bargaining tactic that would enable him to pressure the Senate to include transgendered people, and that he would vote for the bill regardless. He said that the Pride Agenda was aware of his support, but that it had still waged a campaign against him — a charge Mr. Foreman denies.



"I have been getting letters from people saying, `Don't stand in the way of Sonda, we've waited long enough,' " Mr. Duane said. "And I'm a little taken aback, because I have made it my mission to pass civil rights legislation."



Mr. Foreman and others say that much of the criticism over Sonda, including Mr. Duane's, has come from Democrats since the Pride Agenda endorsed Mr. Pataki, a Republican, for re-election. Several gay and transgendered leaders agreed, and said that the discontent with the Pride Agenda has also been fueled by the fact that it is viewed by lawmakers as "the leading advocacy group for L.G.B.T. issues," as Assemblyman Richard N. Gottfried put it, using the acronym for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered.



But the group, whose members are mostly white and male, has never insisted that transgendered people be included in the bill. The organization is viewed as having become increasingly conservative, whose members are "more likely to show up at a reception than a demonstration," in the words of Assemblywoman Deborah J. Glick, who is gay.



"We've all ceded it to them," said Andy Humm, a longtime gay rights advocate who has covered the Sonda debate extensively for Gay City News and other papers. "We've retired from the field."



Although Mr. Foreman has said that transgendered advocates came to the table too late, he acknowledged that the Pride Agenda was first asked to change the wording of Sonda in 1998. The group responded by offering to help expand New York City's statute, which already protected gay men and lesbians, to include the transgendered. Mr. Foreman pointed out that three quarters of the transgendered people in the state won protection when the City Council approved that change in April.



After winning a commitment from Mr. Pataki to support the existing Sonda in May 2001, the Pride Agenda became even more loath to change the wording despite stepped-up efforts from groups like Housing Works. "Empire State Pride Agenda was certainly a major voice opposing amending the bill at this point," said Mr. Gottfried, a longtime supporter of gay rights legislation.



Two states and 44 cities, including New York City, Los Angeles, Tucson and Seattle, have civil rights laws that specifically include the transgendered, according to the Transgender Law and Policy Institute. "'The bill that's up before the State Senate now is old-fashioned, obsolete and needs to be updated." said Melissa Sklarz, an advocate for transgender rights.



Defending Sonda has put the Pride Agenda in a delicate logical bind. On the one hand, Mr. Foreman said that some lawyers believed that transgendered people were already covered, because the law bars discrimination based on gender. He pointed out that the attorney general, Eliot Spitzer, has said that transgendered people are covered by the state hate crimes law even though it does not list them specifically.



On the other hand, Mr. Foreman promises that transgender will be a separate category in the Pride Agenda's next effort, an attempt to overhaul the way the state handles human rights complaints. "We've come so close on Sonda so many times," he said, "and this is really the closest we've ever been. And people are really nervous and afraid that we could lose this opportunity."



NYTimes article

skittles



"And laying his finger aside of his nose, giving a nod, up the chimney he rose...

... And I heard him exclaim, ere he drove out of sight, 'Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night!"

-- from A Visit from St. Nicholas, CCMoore

skittles
 


Re: SONDA

Postby The Shadowcat » Mon Dec 16, 2002 10:48 pm

I just read about 4 articles on SONDA that were on my lists, because the vote is set for tomorrow.



The worst part about not having gender inclusion in SONDA is that it doesn't protect anyone who does not fit gender stereotypes. Under the current bill, you can still be fired from your job for looking too "butch" or too "girly".



There's a really good article from Housing Works that explains it well. The whole thing is located at www.housingworks.org/aids...sonda.html



Here's an excerpt:



Quote:


Civil rights are imperative to people whose gender identity or expression does not conform to preconceived definitions of female and male. Gender-inclusive civil rights legislation is needed protect both those who identify as transgender and gender-variant lesbians and gay men who are routinely denied access to basic health care, service in restaurants or stores, housing, employment and contractual services because of their gender identity and expression.



For example, in New York City a federal discrimination suit was recently filed against a beauty salon that fired one of their many lesbian employees for looking "too butch". Such discrimination would still be permissible under SONDA legislation as it is currently written, marginalizing and stigmatizing tens of thousands of New Yorkers while extracting a huge toll in lost wages, increased expenditures on social services and the denial of basic human dignity to which everyone is entitled.






I'm not a very active member of NYSTC, but I agree with their stance on SONDA. If it does pass, it will not protect a good enough percentage of the GLBT population to be worth it. From what I understand, it'd be highly unlikely that they would even attempt to ammend it after it passes (if it does). They've been refusing to change it for several years. It's not going to happen. They're too scared that they'll lose it. At this point, ESPA just wants to pass whatever it can. ESPA has been battling for 31 years, and they're getting very desperate.

----------

"Life's not a bitch. It's a dominatrix. And you are her bitch." -Hazumi

The Shadowcat
 


Re: SONDA

Postby skittles » Tue Dec 17, 2002 10:30 am

Tuesday morning up date on NY bill:

(linkto NY Times article at bottom of post)



Late Scrambling to Pass Gay Rights Bill in Albany

By SHAILA K. DEWAN



December 17, 2002 -- In Albany, bills that get as far as the floor of the Senate almost always pass. But yesterday, lobbyists, lawmakers and even Gov. George E. Pataki were in a last-minute scramble to round up enough votes to pass a gay rights bill that will finally come to the floor today after decades of being blocked by the Republican-led Senate.



The measure, which would add sexual orientation to the categories in the state's antidiscrimination law, was under attack from both the right and the left, with Republicans and some Democrats hesitating on the eve of the vote.



Legislative leaders for each party were uncertain of just how many votes the measure had, and most lawmakers reached yesterday refused to tip their hand, saying they had not yet made a decision.



"It's going to be very close," said Senator Nancy Larraine Hoffmann, a Republican from Madison County and one of the bill's sponsors. "This is a quantum leap for the State Legislature."



Unlike most bills in the Senate, this one will depend for its success on the Democratic minority, and is an early test of the political skills of its newly elected leader, Senator David A. Paterson of Harlem.



But criticism of the bill from groups who want it to include a provision protecting transgendered people from discrimination does not seem to have translated into nay votes by Democrats. Rather, a few more conservative Democrats are expected to vote against the measure.



On the Republican side, where about a dozen votes are needed, senators have been under intense pressure from the Conservative Party, which promised that a yes vote would count doubly against lawmakers when it was time to hand out endorsements.



The bill is one of two major pieces of legislation that the Senate will address in a rare December meeting. The other is a bill to lower the blood alcohol limit for drivers to .08 percent from .10 percent, a measure that will permit the state to receive more federal money for highways. The Assembly has passed both bills.



In October, one day before the state's largest gay rights group was to decide on its endorsement in the governor's race, Senator Joseph L. Bruno, the majority leader, announced that he would finally allow the bill to come to the floor. The group, the Empire State Pride Agenda, then endorsed Governor Pataki.



Senator Bruno said at a news conference yesterday that he was inclined to vote for the measure, but that he was not "in any way cajoling" other senators to do so. A spokesman for Mr. Bruno said later that he would vote yes.



Lawmakers and gay rights advocates said Mr. Pataki had been calling senators, urging them to support the bill. "I wouldn't dispute that," said Michael McKeon, a spokesman for the governor.



Of the 31 votes needed to pass the bill, 21 or 22 would have to be from Democrats, Senator Bruno said.



Senator Paterson, who does not officially become minority leader until January but is already stepping into the role, said that after a day of intense lobbying, he could count on 20.



Uncertainty, as well as fear that some lawmakers would not bother to attend the session, kept the bill's supporters on tenterhooks. "Our strategy is to recount and recount and recount every vote," said Jeff Soref, a former co-chairman of the Empire State Pride Agenda. "Five people could be a lot under the circumstances."



Indeed, the five Republican senators from Nassau County, which passed its own gay rights bill two years ago, were considered likely supporters, Mr. Soref said, until the Conservative Party stepped up pressure not to vote for the bill. The party has conducted a mail and e-mail campaign telling its 170,000 members to "do all that you can before we wake up one morning and find that we no longer have the choice of whom we hire or rent our apartments to."



The bill is also opposed by the Catholic Conference and conservative Christian and Jewish groups.



The issue was clearly an uncomfortable one for the Nassau senators. Aides groaned when asked about the bill, and four senators would not reveal how they were voting.



Senator Paterson said the bill would help hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers not covered under city nondiscrimination statutes. "This is vintage civil rights legislation," he said.



Jeff Cook, the political director for the Log Cabin Republicans of New York, a gay organization, praised the governor's involvement and said that if the bill passed, it would "be proof that the Pride Agenda's two-party strategy does work."



NYTimes article

skittles



"And laying his finger aside of his nose, giving a nod, up the chimney he rose...

... And I heard him exclaim, ere he drove out of sight, 'Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night!"

-- from A Visit from St. Nicholas, CCMoore

skittles
 


Vatican strikes back

Postby kukalaka » Tue Dec 17, 2002 11:06 am

Only found a German article on it.



Basically, Vatican is said to plan a 500 pages document against sexual freedom. It would be the first time that well-known attitudes against safer sex, liberal sex education and gay marriages would be summarized in one document.





Yay, progressive much? :mad



They actually justify condemning condoms by saying that they're not safe. Just how stupid is that? :confused



The German article only uses the article "schwul" which only refers to male homosexuals and I'm still trying to decide whether to be offended :wink
















Wenn Du denkst, Du denkst, dann denkst Du nur, Du denkst, denn beim Denken der Gedanken kommst Du nur auf den Gedanken, daß das Denken der Gedanken ein gedankenloses Denken ist.



kukalaka
 


Re: Vatican strikes back

Postby Patches » Tue Dec 17, 2002 2:48 pm

The church reiterating, yet again, the great commandment: "Thou shalt not frustrate procreation!" - regardless of consequence :mad Oh, wait, I forgot; according to the church it's okay to be gay, you just can't 'do' gay. (grumble). :spin



Keeping all digits crossed the NY bill passes - ty for the update!

Patches
 


Re: SONDA

Postby PJ » Tue Dec 17, 2002 6:44 pm

Update: Sonda passed and signed into law. Albany Times Union article below

ALBANY -- Gov. George Pataki signed a bill into law Tuesday to outlaw discrimination against homosexuals in New York state, 31 years after advocates began lobbying for it.



Earlier Tuesday, state senators had passed the Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act (SONDA), 34-26. The state Assembly approved the measure in January -- as it has annually since 1993.



Pataki received an endorsement for re-election from Empire State Pride Agenda, the largest gay and lesbian group in the state, after the Republican state Senate said in October it would take up the bias bill.



SONDA would protect people from abuse, harassment and discrimination in employment, housing, education and public services based on their sexual preference. It would become law 30 days after gaining the governor's signature, making New York the 13th state to prohibit anti-gay bias.



"This lays the foundation for winning full equality under the law in areas such as taxation, protections for gay youth and transgender people and recognition of our families," said Matt Foreman, executive director of the Empire State Pride Agenda.



A proposed amendment Tuesday to add protections for so-called transgenders -- ranging from cross-dressers to people undergoing sex-change procedures -- failed 19-41.



Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, a Rensselaer County Republican, voted for the bill, as did 12 other Republican senators. Twenty-one Democrats also voted yes.



"The time has come to move on in our lives put this behind us," Bruno said before the vote. "People can live their lives the way they see fit."



"The bill itself is a step in the wrong direction," countered Sen. Serphin Maltese, R-Queens. "We cannot legislate politeness ... the way people feel. That comes through mutual respect."



Cheers and applause from bill advocates sitting in the Senate gallery greeted the announcement of the final vote total Tuesday.



Usually, bills that make it onto the floor are predestined to pass in the Senate, where Republicans dominate 37-24 and the GOP controls the flow of legislation. The fate of SONDA, however, remained unclear until the voting began Tuesday.



Foreman said he had doubts about its passage less than an hour before debate started. On Sunday, he counted only eight Republicans in support of it. He credited behind-the-scenes lobbying by Pataki and Bruno with swaying enough Republicans to win passage of the measure.



"We have to fight hand-to-hand combat for every vote we get," he said.



Michael Brennan, a Rochester resident who came to Albany to protest SONDA, carried a sign outside the Capitol Tuesday that read "God's plan is marriage between husband and wife."



"This is leading down the road to loss of free speech. Eventually, my convictions will become a hate crime," he said, before he and transgender advocates began arguing. "It will interfere with my ability to teach my grandchildren my values."



"This is a sad day for Christians," said the Rev. Duane Motley of New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms. "Homosexuality is condemned in the Bible. Christian businessmen should have the right to not hire people that they believe are engaged in immoral behavior."



SONDA opponents included both religious organizations and transgenders, who argued a nondiscrimination bill was also needed to protect them.



"I think it would be an absolute and utter tragedy if this passes" without protecting transgender rights, said Charles King, co-president of Housing Works.



New York City resident Melissa Sklarz accused Empire State Pride Agenda of abandoning transgenders. "They have closed the door on us time and time again," she said.



They preferred that SONDA be voted down without the transgender amendment proposed by Sen. Thomas Duane, the chamber's only openly gay member.



"We are fighting among ourselves," said the Manhattan Democrat. "I promise the transgender community I'm not going to forget. The battle for that begins right away."



Foreman estimated that 75 percent of transgender people in the state live in New York City -- where a city law already protects them against discrimination.



"It's totally unfair for all these downstate people to be saying, 'All you upstate gays can wait'" for an anti-gay discrimination bill, said Foreman.



He said establishment of protection against discrimination for homosexuals was a historic step for gays and lesbians rights advocates, who plan to propose a sweeping change of the state's human rights laws next year.



"You really can't be advancing things like domestic partnership rights when, if you go to your employer and say, 'I have a domestic partner,' they can fire you because you're gay," Foreman said.





PJ
 


Re: SONDA

Postby Patches » Tue Dec 17, 2002 11:42 pm

Good news, thanks for posting PJ.





Patches
 


Re: CNN News

Postby tkheaven » Wed Dec 18, 2002 3:53 pm

This just in... well, i just got emailed about it...



CNN.com - Teen lesbian sues school for bias - Dec. 17, 2002



Quote:
LOS ANGELES, California (CNN) -- A 15-year-old female student who says she was banned from gym class at school because she is a lesbian filed a lawsuit Tuesday against her instructors and the school district, accusing them of discrimination.



Ashly Massey and her mother, along with the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Center for Lesbian Rights, filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.



They claim that in March, when Ashly was an 8th grade student at Coombs Middle School in Riverside County, she was removed from physical education class and made to sit in the school principal's office.



The suit alleges that Ashly's gym teacher told the girl's mother, Amelia Massey, that her daughter's sexual orientation made other girls in the class "uncomfortable being around Ashly in the locker room."



The gym teacher allegedly told Ashly she was no longer allowed to go to P.E. class, and for the next week and a half Ashly said she was made to sit in the principal's office instead of participating in the class.



"Every day that Ashly sat in the office, other students would see her there and ask her why she was there," the suit says. "The other students assumed she had done something wrong and was in the principal's office to be disciplined."



Ashly said the situation was "humiliating and denigrating" and made her feel that she was being punished because of her sexual orientation.



Among other claims in the lawsuit, Massey's attorneys say their client's right to equal protection under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was violated and that the "defendants' conduct constituted discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in violation of California Education Code."



The suit names the Banning Unified School District, Massey's gym teacher, principal, vice principal, and school superintendent as defendants.



Massey and her mother are seeking monetary damages and asking teachers and administrators in the school district to conduct an anti-bias program.



CNN was unable to reach the Banning School District or their attorneys for comment.


Tk's new and improved "GrrArgg"...Tk's Heaven


"I've become really protective of her. I want to make sure if Tara comes back, it's for good reason." -Amber Benson
Tara ate her, devoured her from beneath. -The Edge of Silence giving new meaning to this season's catch phrase.
"Got it: that's a 'yes' to petals; a 'no' to pricks. I should remember that more often." -On Second Thought

tkheaven
 


Re: SONDA

Postby Dumbsaint » Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:28 am

The New York Times did an article recently about new studies of queer youth. Kind of controversial stuff, but certainly interesting in the points it makes.





Spank me, I'm Julia.

Dumbsaint
 


NY Times article on Civil Rights legislation

Postby FlereImsaho » Sun Dec 29, 2002 2:00 pm

That is an interesting article Julia. At least they are talking about it. Talking needs to happen.



Here is another article from today's NY Times that might be of interest, titled The Republicans Try to Redefine Civil Rights. It mostly covers fallout from Trent Lott's foot-in-mouth episode. One paragraph caught my eye:

Quote:
Members of both parties say the only traditional civil rights proposal with even a slim chance of gaining bipartisan support in the coming session does not deal with race. Instead, the bill would make it a federal crime to physically attack someone because of his or her sexual orientation, sex or disability. It came close to passing in 2000 but lacked enough Republican support this year. (Mr. Frist and Mr. Lott opposed it.)




I'm not optimistic at all, but will certainly keep an eye on this issue, especially Mr. Frist's position.



FlereImsaho
 


Britain’s first openly gay judge

Postby feena191 » Sun Jan 05, 2003 9:09 am

This is an article in today’s The Mail on Sunday in the UK, I can’t find a reference online yet.

Quote:
The ‘quiet QC’ who is Britain’s first openly gay judge by Martin Delgado

Britain has its first openly gay high court judge. The appointment of Adrian Fulford, a 49-year-old QC, has been welcomed by gay rights campaigners as a development of ‘monumental importance’.



Mr Justice Fulford, as he will now be known, has been entrusted with a post of tremendous political sensitivity.



He is to be Britain’s representative at the International Criminal Court, the controversial new war crimes forum which most countries have signed up to but America is still boycotting.



Described by colleagues as an easygoing, pleasant and confident man, he lives with his long-term partner, Spanish student Luis Tejado, in a £500,000 terraced house in Stoke Newington, North London.



He is on record only once as having spoken publicly about his sexuality and that was an in an interview with Gay Times ten years ago when he described what it as like to be shunned by colleagues.



‘What made me absolutely determined to be out – apart from the question of personal integrity – was watching other barristers who were desperate not to be revealed as being gay,’ he said.



‘I couldn’t face the prospect of ending up like one of them. You see them in bars and pubs or clubs, other members of the bar who, when they see me, will turn their backs, will do anything not to be associated with me, with anyone who is “out” at work.’



As a junior barrister, he specialised in gay-related cases and in the late Eighties and early Nineties nearly half his workload was in this area of law.



He was in the defence team in the notorious Operation Spanner trial of 1990 when a group of men were jailed for taking part in consensual sado-masochistic sex. He also defended two lesbians accused of ‘glassing’ a doorman at the Colherne pub, a gay haunt in West London.



But as his career took off as a member of barrister Michael Mansfield’s chambers, he concentrated on mainstream criminal work and took on a number of high-profile cases, including defending footballer Dennis Wise, accused of assaulting a taxi driver.



Another of his clients was schizophrenic knifeman David Morgan, given ten life sentences for slashing the throats of 17 women in a rampage in a Birmingham department store in 1994.



Mr Fulford briefly attracted unwelcome attention in 2001 when he was among defence barristers criticised by Mr Justice Butterfield for ringing up a massive legal aid bill in the trial of four Afghans accused of hijacking a plane at Stansted Airport.



But apart from that, the former boarding school pupil and Southampton University graduate has remained steadfastly out of the public eye – a virtue which may have commended him to the Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine, during his latest round of appointments to the bench.



In his Gay Times interview in 1992, Fulford described the ‘wonderful’ ceremony of ‘taking silk’, when newly appointed QCs are required to dress up in old-fashioned finery.



‘They start with patent leather silver buckled shoes, then silk stockings and silk breeches. There’s a sort of 18th Century frock coat, the most enormous silk jabot (frilled handkerchief), a great silk gown and full-bottomed wig that practically comes down to your waist. It’s outrageous, a fabulous costume, but you only get to wear it for the one day.’



Veteran gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell said Mr Fulford’s appointment was a ‘monumental milestone’ which showed that barriers in the legal profession were slowly coming down at last.



Colin Richardson, who did the Gay Times interview, told The Mail on Sunday : ‘We had a long and very pleasant conversation. It was clear even then that his ambition was to be a judge but he didn’t want to be known as a gay judge – he wanted to be known for doing what he’s good at.



‘What makes this appointment so significant is that the Lord Chancellor would have been well aware that Adrian is gay.’



There is a thriving Bar Lesbian and Gay Group and current official guidelines are also much more inclusive.



Would-be judges are told: ‘The Lord Chancellor will recommend for appointment the candidates who appear to him to be the best regardless of gender, ethnic origin, marital status, sexual orientation, political affiliation, religion or disability, except when the disability prevents the fulfilment of the physical requirements of the office.’



Mr Justice Fulford’s neighbour, Mr Paul Deodat, a retired post office sorter, said last night: ‘He’s a very friendly man. He and his partner invited us all round for drinks over Christmas.’



Mr Justice Fulford declined to comment, saying he was bound by rules which bar judges from giving interviews save in exceptional circumstances.


Feena

-x-



feena191
 


Students fight to open doors for gay clubs in area schools

Postby skittles » Sun Jan 05, 2003 11:19 am

in addition to the article, there is a list of resources at the end of the post from a sidebar with the article.



From the Houston (Texas) Chronicle



Students fight to open doors for gay clubs in area schools



Teens cite bias, but critics say groups too risky

By LUCAS WALL



Marla Dukler, a 16-year-old junior at Klein High School, says she has often been harassed for being a lesbian. Last month, a group of male students shoved her into a wall of lockers and "called me a faggot before they walked off."



Dukler is among a group of Klein students trying to start a Gay-Straight Alliance. Similar extracurricular clubs for gay youth and their allies at other schools work to fight discriminatory violence, offer peer support and help the school community learn about sexual orientation, diversity, tolerance and gay rights.



"At my school there's a lot of harassment that goes on and students don't necessarily feel safe," Dukler said. "I just wanted to form a place where people could go and have support. It makes it easier to wake up in the morning and go to school."



Debate over whether GSAs should be allowed to meet in schools has been percolating across the country in the past eight years and has now arrived in Harris County. Klein students say their application has been held up, and students at Cypress Falls and Jersey Village high schools in the Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District say their requests this year have been turned down.



Proponents point to court decisions allowing GSAs to meet under the Equal Access Act, a federal law passed to protect students' First Amendment rights. The act prohibits publicly funded schools from discriminating against the establishment of student clubs based on their points of view.



"Homosexuals are the most openly discriminated group of individuals," said Brent Fry, a 17-year-old heterosexual senior at Cypress Falls.



"School districts are the breeding grounds for these types of feelings. ... This club would be a great place to have programs that would help."



A 2001 survey by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, a New York-based group that fights anti-gay discrimination in schools, showed 84 percent of gay students questioned heard anti-gay remarks at school, 31 percent had skipped classes because they felt unsafe and 21 percent had been assaulted.



"GSAs are meant to create school communities where all people are respected and accepted regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity and expression," said Eliza Byard, the network's deputy director. "I would challenge anyone to find fault with such an important purpose."



The first GSA was formed in 1989 in Massachusetts. The clubs spread slowly throughout the United States, swelling in number in the past few years as more teens began to declare their homosexuality earlier in life. The network's registry now contains almost 1,700 alliances in high schools in 46 states and the District of Columbia.



These clubs remain rare in this region, however. The Chronicle asked the 58 school districts in the eight-county metropolitan area if they have any alliances in their high schools. All but three districts responded, though information provided by the Houston Independent School District was incomplete.



The survey found only three GSAs currently meeting in 123 area high schools: Bellaire and Reagan in HISD and La Porte in La Porte ISD.



Opponents of such groups say it is inappropriate for schools to promote gay rights and fear the clubs will turn into dating services where kids will talk about sex and seek partners.



"Their behavior is risky behavior that results in disease and death," said Kathy Haigler of Houston, executive director of the Texas Eagle Forum, a conservative pro-family organization. "We would be against a high school allowing them to meet together. It'd be like having a smoking club or a drinking club. It's unhealthy behavior.



"Why would the schools want to promote minors having sexual discussions with each other?"



Students, however, dismissed claims they would gather to chat about sex.



"I'm not interested in knowing about the other people's sex lives and not interested in having people know about mine," said Amanda Dillon, a 16-year-old junior at Jersey Village High who came out as a lesbian her freshman year.



Lee Longoria, founder of the Gay-Straight Alliance at Reagan High, said all but a few of his two dozen members are straight. Longoria, a gay senior, said his group has heard from a parent about what it's like to raise a gay son, has watched gay-themed movies and plans to discuss the stages of revealing one's sexual orientation. The group has helped create a more tolerant climate at Reagan, he said.



"As long as people see that it's there, then they'll be more willing to accept it," Longoria said. "But if we keep on hiding, then nothing comes from that."



The National Mental Health Association launched a campaign against anti-gay bullying in schools last month. The Alexandria, Va.-based association said gay youth "face daily threats to their mental and physical health -- ranging from anti-gay taunts to beatings -- in their schools and communities" and "are at increased risk for depression, anxiety disorders, school failure, and often suicide."



One of the campaign's six suggestions for schools is to encourage students to start a GSA.



"Youth whose schools had these kinds of groups were less likely to have reported feeling unsafe in their schools," according to the association.



Will Harrell, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, said school districts are prohibited from discriminating against students who want to start a gay rights group.



"The law is so clear, there's no reason to squander judicial resources in trying to fight this out," Harrell said. "My concern is that when the school administration is creating such a hostile environment, most of these young kids or their parents are afraid to pursue their statutory rights."



Not all opposition comes from school administrators. One of the first GSAs in Texas, formed at Leander High School near Austin in fall 1999, faced an immediate petition drive by students seeking its demise. And this year, after a GSA started at La Porte High, students ripped down posters advertising its meetings.



This is the second school year that Dillon and Alexis Hall, a 17-year-old senior, have tried to start a Gay-Straight Alliance at Jersey Village High. This fall, they said, an associate principal told them the school district would not allow such a club.



Each school principal in the Cy-Fair district is responsible for reviewing student club applications. Kelli Durham, assistant superintendent for communication, said the issues of sexual orientation and dating are "a can of worms that is social, not something that relates to school activities."



But Durham denied the district has told its principals to prohibit gay-oriented clubs.



"If the administrator said that, that was not the position of the district," she said. "That was a misinterpretation."



Questions for Jersey Village principal Ralph Funk were referred back to Durham.



At Cypress Falls High, Brandon Pfluger has led a group of students attempting to start a GSA. Pfluger, an 18-year-old senior, said principal Sue Pope told him in October to revise the club's statement of purpose, a document required of all groups wishing to form extracurricular clubs.



Pfluger said he feels the school is intentionally thwarting his efforts.



"We shouldn't be denied the right to have a club because of its purpose," he said. "We made sure to state all members are welcome. We want to learn not only about gay culture but provide a safe haven for those who need it."



Pope said there has been no decision to stop the alliance from organizing.



"We really have to understand the purpose of the club," she said. "They are not being treated any differently from any other group."



Pfluger expressed frustration that 72 other clubs are recognized at his school, including a Muslim Student Association, Fellowship of Christian Athletes, Hearts of Asia and Honorary Hispanic Role Models.



Efforts to start a GSA at a third Cy-Fair ISD high school failed last school year and have not been revived. Daniel Sahwani, 17, who graduated from Langham Creek High School last May, said he submitted an application on behalf of 25 students and was turned down.



Carolyn Williams, Langham Creek associate principal, referred questions to Durham, who reiterated her previous statements.



In the Klein ISD, the district's policy concerning student clubs was amended Nov. 11 -- only weeks after students at Klein High had asked to start a GSA.



The new policy states no groups shall be permitted that promote criminal behavior or acts that pose a risk to students' health and welfare "including, but not limited to, sexual activity by minors."



Principal Pat Huff said he passed the GSA application on to Superintendent Jim Surratt "because of the controversial nature of the club" and the district's conservative population.



"Because of the community that we serve, we're a little different than some of the other high schools maybe in the inner city that have allowed the club to go forward," Huff said. "I have to always be thinking about the people, our constituency."



Dukler said she objects to the school district's changing policy after her application was submitted -- she thinks it was amended specifically to forbid a GSA -- and feels Surratt is purposefully delaying making a decision.



Liz Johnson, assistant superintendent for community relations, said the changes were made as part of a routine policy review, not to prevent an alliance. Surratt has a stack of club applications he's yet to consider, she added.



"We think this will need study and some consideration, very careful consideration," Johnson said.



Dukler said her group is prepared to sue if the district denies the club. Her parents and those of other applicants have contacted the ACLU and Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, a New York-based group that litigates for gay rights.



"I'm hoping it will be resolved fairly quickly," Dukler said, "but I am not going to take no for an answer."



end of article



Also, with the article was this small bit:



RESOURCES

A Gay-Straight Alliance has been barred at Cypress Falls High School because the principal did not accept the students' four-page statement of purpose. Here are some excerpts from their proposal:



· Students outlined activities for the club such as community service projects, participation in Houston's gay pride parade, partaking in the National Day of Silence to discourage homophobia and hurtful remarks, observing Gay History Month, promoting AIDS awareness and testing for sexually transmitted diseases, and having a workshop for teachers to educate them about gay issues.



· Issues of discussion mentioned for club meetings include: homophobia, stereotypes, family acceptance, coming out, dealing with rejection from family and friends, how homosexuality is perceived, and promoting positive relationships between gay and straight students.



· One of the group's central goals is eliminating homophobia at Cypress Falls. It lists 10 ways homophobia affects heterosexual students, including forcing men to act "macho" and women to act "feminine" to avoid being called gay or lesbian, making it hard to maintain a close friendship with someone of the same sex, and forcing kids to engage in sexual activity earlier to prove they are not homosexual.



· In summary, the group notes: "We believe that a Gay-Straight Alliance is important for Cypress Falls High School. All students have the right to come to school and feel safe, and for many homosexual/bisexual students at CFHS, that right is not granted. Social tolerance is the main idea behind any Gay-Straight Alliance. We feel that a GSA at CFHS will offer a place for those who feel like outcasts and a place for those who do not understand and are looking for understanding about different lifestyles."

skittles



"I love the with a love I seemed to lose With all my lost saints, - I love thee with the breath,

Smiles, tears, of all my life!! - and, if God choose, I shall but love thee better after death."

-- Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Sonnet XLIII, from the Portuguese

skittles
 

PreviousNext

Return to Board index

Return to The Kitten

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


Powered by phpBB The phpBB Group © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007
Style based on a Cosa Nostra Design