God, WebWarlock, you hit the nail right on the head by stating that it's much like the old and nasty VHS vs Betamax conflict. In fact, it echoes many more utterly ridiculous trade wars in which only consumers lose--
consider:
1. Monaural vs Stereo--this was the first really destructive format war. Record stores
hated it, since they had to carry
double stock on all of their records (mono and stereo records were
not compatible). It was not until the arrival of the "universal" pressing technology (sometime in the mid 1960s) that the conflict ended, but even so many worthwhile mono recordings fell by the wayside because many people refused to buy "old-fashioned-sounding" recordings!!!!
2. Stereo vs Quadraphonic--another needlessly destructive trade war, this time involving four (4!!!) mutually incompatible formats during the 1970s. As a result, the whole idea of 4-channel sound fell by the wayside (Although, oddly enough, it has been revived for use with video!).
3. VHS vs Beta--and again :( Beta was clearly the superior technology, but VHS had the greater capacity and more available software.
4. And now this--my philosophy is to
wait it out, and see which one "wins". I believe it will all depend on (a) which format is "backwards compatible" (i.e., playable on a "normal" DVD player) and (b) which format has the most software available for it. Trust me, this won't be pretty.
