Ruthificus… I wasn’t thinking about Final Exam, or any in particular when I suggested outside links for broad fics. However, now that you bring it up, this is a good example of a fic containing peripheral characters and maybe plots that are dealing mainly with W/T or with Willow or Tara separately. From what I’ve read so far most updates deal with W/T or them individually and I find nothing wrong with that. Like I said, I love lots of characters involved in W/T stories as long as it mainly deals with W/T.
So basically I vote please don’t… re: linking to your site.
Kath- Some people may not want to link to outside sites but I have and I would if I’m interested in the summary. How would this fracture the writers from DCP? If someone wants to link their W/T fic more power to them and us. I’ve stumbled upon sites that have various pairings and there might be one fantastic W/T fic I’ve never read before. Are you saying that just because they write for other couples we shouldn’t be aware of it? If they read the FAQ and know what DCP is about and they have a fic that includes our prerequisites then what would be so bad about them “advertising” it here? Not everyone posts here or on Willtara because of this fact. If someone is taking the time to write a sweet W/T fic I want to read it whether they’ve written for other couples or not.
I myself am guilty of having wideranging casts of characters but I remain W/T focussed - I have no interest in anything else. The real problem is that the decision is a very hard one for anyone but the writer to make as only the writer knows what is going to happen. The writers that we have here, and this will increasingly be the case as (sadly inevitably over time) this gets whittled to a "harder" core, know what is W/T... and what is not. What decision are you talking about? Keeping the fic mainly W/T oriented? I’m thinking this is a W/T centered fic board it’s not too much to ask to keep the W/T to a maximum. Plus, having boundaries could even be better for fic writers look how the flaming O spell turned out.
Set up is fine, it’s necessary, and maybe because most people post in chapters that you think this may be what I’m referring to. No. Actually I wait for a few chapters to be posted up before I cut and paste and then read as a whole. I don’t like little chapters (though I’ve done it myself plenty of times and I’m working on stopping that). With larger updates I find I am able to read and invest myself in the fic, not cut myself off just as it’s leading up to W/T. Obviously in the beginning W/T may not be the main focus, but as long as the rest of the fic is… that’s what I’m suggesting. Sometimes I’m in the mood for a long introduction and other times I’m in the mood to just jump right in.
AU is perfect for such ‘a set-up period of parts that might not be 75% W/T’. However, we need to keep in mind that unless a fic is AU we really do not need much introduction. (my opinion) Our audience knows the characters and situation already if you note properly and spending four pages introducing the characters and their situation can get a bit stale. Not that anyone’s done this here, I’m just saying in general.
More generally some fics have very little by way of explanation or notes up front of what sort of fic it is. But that is just my personal bug bear... Not just yours. We all need to make sure the guidelines are followed though. Remind the author in the thread to list the requirements on their thread. I posted them up in this thread for someone a while back and I think they may be included in the FAQ. editing to add: oops. i guess it isn't in the faq. i'm going to post it there now.
I also agree the reader has a choice to stop reading. It could be simply because they do not like the format of the fic, or it’s not their cup of tea or whatever it may be… but flexibility from the reader is different from flexibility of the writer. Like I said this is a W/T fanfic board. I come here to read W/T. W/T need to be the focus of the story and for me I’d like the focus to be mainly 75 %. That is what I’d like to discuss. How much W/T is required.
I am probably saying all this wrong... I agree about the focus... and the amount, most of what you say in fact Rane, it is just the method that I have a problem with. What exactly do you mean by methods, Kath?
******
Also there was another thing I wanted to discuss but I think I’ll wait until Xita gives me the go…
Edited by: Rane018 at: 5/27/02 2:10:38 pm