Miracles still happen? 
I won't print the hate quotes because they are sickening. Check out the links above for the vitriol when you can stomache it. Let's hope we can get a new president that does not pander to the religious right. Given the revelations in the Downing Street memo, Bush should be impeached but that can't happen without taking control of congress in 2006. IMHO for GLBT folks this is a matter of survival and I hope more will look at the quotes above and give the repugs fewer gay votes than they got in 2004.Nazi Anti-Jewish Speech
VS.
Religious Right Anti-Gay Speech
"When you say...you [gay Americans] are not a group of people who need special protection. You do well economically. You are an elite. That is precisely the argument that has been made in behalf of the worst kind of discrimination against Jewish people."
- United States Senator Paul Wellstone, July 29, 1994 -
Responding to a religious right spokesman's anti-gay testimony
Someone painted God Hates Fags on the school rock at Howell High School, and a graduating student, Shayla Kamiliar, got her friends together to paint over the hate graffiti. They spray-painted the rock, then wrote Love all over a number of pieces of school property. They have been accused of vandalism (which is, of course, what they perpetrated, in the form of civil disobedience), suspended from class, and barred from the graduation ceremony.
More than two hundred students protested the punishment, and one of the parents decided to put together a backyard ceremony for the group's three graduating seniors. That ceremony has now been moved to a football field. A teacher will address the three graduates and their friends, the valedictorian will come by and give his speech again, and the superintendent is making sure the grads have caps and gowns.
A Tennessee-based religious organization euphemistically called “Love in Action” is running a brainwashing camp for gay kids.
Among the camp’s practices, posted on the blog of a youth whose parents are forcing him to attend:
Kids in the program are not allowed to speak to anyone, not even their parents, for at least the first two days.
Kids are not allowed to go anywhere unless they are accompanied by at least two other participants, one of which has to have at least 8 weeks of prior indoctrination.
Kids are not allowed to keep a journal or a diary
Kids are not allowed to discuss what goes on in the program with anyone, not even their parents
Kids are not allowed to have contact with any family members other than parents, who also go through the program
Kids are not allowed to have any physical contact with any human being other than a hand shake or a pat on the shoulder, and only when authorized.
Kids are not allowed outside of a small geographic area within Memphis, even if accompanied by parents, without prior written authorization
Kids are not allowed to listen to any music that is not explicitly Christian (Bach and Beethoven are specifically forbidden as being non-Christian)
Kids are not permitted to enter restaurants that serve alcohol
Kids are not allowed to speak after 9:00 p.m. under any circumstance
Kids may be placed in a state of isolation where they are not allowed to communicate with one another
Ex-gay programs, however misguided, are fine for consenting adults who for whatever reason think they want to change their sexual orientation (despite zero proof that it is even possible). This program is administered to minors against their will. It is forced indoctrination, including dehumanizing, degrading treatment. I really hope some civil liberties types will get clued into this and put a stop to it.
In the mean time, a local group of gays and lesbians (largely kids themselves) is orchestrating a protest outside of this cult-like establishment every day for the next two weeks. Kudos to them. If I were within a reasonable distance I would be right there with them. The protest has garnered some local media coverage, and the story is heating up in the blogosphere. Let’s put an end to this outrageous treatment of innocent kids.
In the latest post on the Queer Action coalition blog, they posted a precis of an interview that they did with a former participant in the program, who outlined activities such as:
[…] “shaming sessions”, where the clients have to, once a day, describe in emotional detail “sinful activities” they’d partaken in…these sessions were then extended to having to describe these things in front of 50 or 60 people on “friends and family” nights, where the family was encouraged to shame them, not be supportive.
This is “love” in action.
Note: The blog from the youth whose parents are forcing him to go to this camp hasn’t been updated since before the camp started. Reading the comments, however, you will find updates from his friends who are sort of spying on him and showing up “accidentally” here and there so that he knows he is being supported from the outside.
The Queer Action Coalition reports that Monday's demonstration was the largest yet. Two psychiatrists showed up, as well as a former victim of the Love in Action brainwashing camp. The Republic of T has a better name for the camp: Camp Hetero Horror.
Mike Ditto at Janus Online points out the similarities between Camp Hetero Horror and cults.
Andrew Sullivan says if you can't be there to Act-Up, "you can send your moral support to the abused kid here. Blogs can be oases of freedom in totalitarian societies, and also in fundamentalist boot camps."
Zach now has almost 500 supportive comments on his last post. He has not been able to blog since his arrival at the camp. Reading the comments makes me feel better about the deplorable state of our species, so I'm posting a few of them here, in case it makes you feel better too. There are also some good ideas, or things we can do that might help Zach.
Hi, Zach: Your story has hit the blogosphere like a ton of bricks. Andrew Sullivan mentioned you the other day, and so have a lot of other writers -- including me. I'm a journalist working in the LGBT print and radio sectors. I've been on my email all day letting editors and broadcasters know about your story. Love in Action has received a lot of negative press in the past because of its cruel treatment of its clients, and the brainwashing techniques it employs.. Please remember that you have done nothing wrong, no matter what you have been told. Please also remember that God is a Being of compassion, mercy and forgiveness. No one acting in His name would ever hurt you like this.
Posted by Crow
I'm here for you all the way. Keep your chin up. When you get out, if you need a place to go, I have a spare bed. I'm in Dallas, so that might be a bit far for you, but if you need somewhere to go, just email me. We're all here for you. Much love.
Posted by Hannah
I just submitted the story and some relevant info to the ACLU. I hope anyone else who reads this does the same so that they'll pick it up and do something. Child abuse should never be tolerated.
Posted by Chris
It occurs to me that if the Brainwashing In Action people discover the existence of all these comments supporting Zach, they might try to persuade his parents to have his account shut down for fear of actually, you know, all these comments making Zach feel like he's a good person the way he is, or something. I have therefore saved all the comment pages (up through comment 377) to text files -- strictly text files, no pics or links or anything -- just so he can read them all in case something happens to his account.
Posted by mike
Zach spoke of suicide in his last post:
"I'm not a suicidal person... really I'm not.. I think it's stupid - really. But.. I can't help it, no im not going to commit suicide, all I can think about is killing my mother and myself. It's so horrible. This is what it's doing to me... I have this horrible feeling all of the time... I wish this on no person... I'm so satisfied--happy's too strong of a word the state I'm in-- that everyone's taking the time to email and write letters in complaint to these people. I dont know if it will do anything, but if something did happen it would be -- awesome."
A Massachusetts survey of high school gays found that 40% reported they had attempted suicide. Zach is going to need all the support he can get when he gets out of Camp Hetero Horror.
It only takes a couple of minutes to set up an account and leave a comment on his blog.
Canadian Forces sees first gay wedding
Tuesday, June 14, 2005 Updated at 4:04 PM EDT
Canadian Press
Halifax — The Canadian military is marking its first gay wedding.
Two men, who do not want to be identified, exchanged vows in a small ceremony at Canadian Forces Base Greenwood in western Nova Scotia.
It was the first time the military has presided over a same-sex union after introducing guidelines in 2003 dealing with the contentious issue.
The two men, one a sergeant, the other a warrant officer, were married last month by a United Church minister because the base chaplain is Anglican and couldn't officiate.
But, Lt-Cmdr. David Greenwood helped arrange the service and preached at it.
He says it might encourage other gays and lesbians in the military to come forward and make their vows official.
A spokeswoman with National Defence confirmed it was the first wedding for a gay couple in the military's history.
The department's guidelines say same-sex couples must be treated like heterosexuals.
The Nova Scotia Supreme Court ruled last September that banning same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.
Romney backs new effort to prohibit gay marriages
Proposal for ballot excludes civil unions
By Raphael Lewis, Globe Staff | June 17, 2005
Governor Mitt Romney yesterday endorsed a grass-roots effort to pass a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in Massachusetts in 2008, abandoning his support for what he called a ''muddied" compromise measure that would also ban gay marriages but allow gays to enter into civil unions.
Romney, who is courting conservative voters for a possible presidential run in 2008, said the newly proposed ban would give voters a chance to consider a ''clean, straightforward, unambiguous amendment" that does not include civil unions.
''I'm concerned that the amendment currently under consideration by the Legislature is somewhat confused or muddied by the combination of two things: One is the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman, which I support, and the other is the requirement that there be civil unions in the Commonwealth, which is a provision I do not support," Romney told reporters after a group of same-sex marriage opponents unveiled the new proposed amendment in a separate press conference.
In announcing their plans to back a new proposed amendment, opponents of same-sex marriage said they believe that the compromise amendment before the Legislature would be defeated because conservative lawmakers who had backed it last year would join them to support the new alternative that simply bans gay marriage.
The Legislature is expected to meet in Constitutional Convention this fall to take up the compromise amendment, which was sponsored by Senate President Robert E. Travaglini and Senate Republican leader Brian P. Lees.
''The convention has defeated the Travaglini-Lees amendment today," said state Representative Philip Travis, Democrat of Rehoboth, addressing more than 100 backers of the proposed amendment at a State House press conference.
Travis was the only lawmaker to speak at the unveiling of the amendment yesterday. Joining him were representatives of the Massachusetts Family Institute, and a host of Christian leaders, including a representative of the four dioceses of the Roman Catholic Church in Massachusetts. The ballot committee calls itself Voteonmarriage.org.
To amend the state constitution via a citizens' ballot initiative, organizers will need to gather the signatures of roughly 66,000 Massachusetts voters this fall, then win the backing of one quarter of the Legislature's 200 members in two successive sessions, and then win at the ballot box in the November 2008 election. By contrast, the compromise amendment, which was generated by the Legislature, requires a majority vote of lawmakers in two successive sessions to be sent to voters.
Yesterday's developments were a dramatic new turn in the state's political debate around gay marriage, which was legalized by the Supreme Judicial Court in a Nov. 18, 2003 decision. In March, a Boston Globe poll indicated that 56 percent of those surveyed supported same-sex marriage.
Reflecting the uneasiness among politicians over same-sex marriage, last spring the Legislature passed the Travaglini-Lees amendment to ban gay marriage but allow civil unions. It cleared by just five votes. At the time, Romney urged Republicans to back the measure because it was the only one put forth by lawmakers that had a chance of passing.
Travis said his coalition of steadfast gay-marriage opponents in the Legislature included at least a half-dozen lawmakers. If they decide the new amendment is preferable, they would probably vote against the compromise measure and help end its chances of heading to the 2006 ballot if other lawmakers maintain their positions from last year.
Gay-marriage advocates and several lawmakers interviewed yesterday said they were not convinced that the Travaglini-Lees amendment would be defeated.
Lees agreed that the landscape had changed with the announcement of the proposed gay-marriage ban, but said the course ahead was not certain.
''It will change the number of votes -- there's no doubt about that -- and the Senate president and I are going to have to look and see what the options are out there," Lees said, referring to the alternative ballot question. ''We'll have to sit down after the budget's done and figure out what course of action, if any, we want to take."
Arline Isaacson, cochairwoman of the Massachusetts Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus, said she was skeptical of Travis's prediction that some conservatives would abandon the Travaglini-Lees measure. ''It's possible, but I wouldn't bet my mortgage on it," said Isaacson, who has been urging the Legislature to defeat the compromise this year.
Referring to the text of the compromise amendment, Kristian Mineau of the Massachusetts Family Institute, a Newton-based group that opposes gay marriage, said, ''Asking citizens to vote on the Travaglini-Lees amendment is like asking them to vote for George Bush and John Kerry on the same ticket."
The new amendment and Romney's endorsement were criticized by gay activists and by Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for governor in 2006.
''I'm opposed to any effort to take away the rights of gay and lesbian couples to marry," Reilly said in a statement. ''It is unfortunate that the Governor's preoccupation with matters outside of Massachusetts dictate that he play politics with an issue that has been resolved and is working well."
The coalition backing the new amendment includes 20 state and national groups, including the Washington, D.C.-based Family Research Council, Colorado-based Focus on the Family, and the Massachusetts Catholic Conference, which is the lobbying arm of the four Roman Catholic dioceses in the state. Many of the national groups involved are pivotal to the hopes of any Republican presidential aspirant.
In February, Romney told a South Carolina Republican audience that ''from day one, I've opposed the move for same-sex marriage and its equivalent, civil unions." But gay rights groups, including a leading GOP organization, accused Romney of flip-flopping, saying he had supported some benefits for gay couples in his 2002 campaign. He had also urged lawmakers in 2004 to back the compromise amendment.
Yesterday, Rick Beltram, who heads the Spartanburg County, S.C., Republican Party, said Romney's decision to back the new amendment would play well with crucial GOP voters in his state, some of whom are skeptical of a Massachusetts Republican. ''This will continue to reinforce in potential voters down here that he's a real conservative," Beltram said.
But Romney also drew a criticism that he was playing to a national conservative audience.
''As the governor considers a run for president in 2008, he has bowed to right-wing pressure to eliminate even the most basic rights for same-sex families in Massachusetts," said a statement released by the Washington-based Human Rights Campaign, which supports gay marriage.
Another analysis came from Dan Schnur, a Republican consultant in California who served as spokesman for Governor Pete Wilson and communications director for Arizona Senator John McCain's presidential campaign in 2000. He said Romney was engaging in a time-honored political tradition of ''changing his language on an issue without changing his position."
''Just as John Kerry talked about the war in Iraq much differently in the Democratic primary than during the general election, that's what Mitt Romney is doing," Schnur said.
Romney, who recently opposed a Democrat-sponsored stem cell research bill, has again found himself aligned with the four Massachusetts bishops of the Roman Catholic church. The bishops issued a statement saying they were giving their permission for the ballot committee to gather signatures outside Catholic churches.
''This proposed amendment restores to our laws the traditional definition of marriage," the bishops' statement said. ''To remain effective as society's primary institution for ensuring the well-being of children, marriage must be understood by government as a commitment involving one man and one woman."
But a religious leader who listened in on the ballot committee's press conference criticized the tone of the organizers.
''I lived outside Montgomery, Ala., in 1963, and the people there were convinced that government was forcing its agenda on them to enfranchise blacks," said the Rev. Jep Streit, dean of St. Paul's Episcopal Cathedral in Boston. ''They said it was outrageous that the will of the people was opposed. The rhetoric sounds the same to me."
Dear "Today Show," your anti-gay contest is quite likely illegal
by John in DC - 6/22/2005 12:09:00 PM
UPDATE: Today Show's email. You know what to do. today@nbc.com
NBC's Today Show is offering a wedding contest where the lucky winners get a wedding and honeymoon thrown by the Today Show. Great! Except that the rules explicitly ban gay couples from winning.
Check out what the contest rules say:
each couple submitting a completed application form must consist of a male and a female, each of whom is at least 21 years of age as of June 13, 2005;
(Gee. Wonder how NBC feels about inter-racial couples?)
First, uh, bigot much? The marriage of gays is legal in Massachusetts, so where does the Today Show get off banning gay couples?
Second, uh, lawsuit much? I researched a similar issue extensively a few years back - remember Sandals resorts that used to ban gay couples, well a number of US companies were offering contests where the prizes were a trip to Sandals, but the contests banned gay couples. I talked to the ACLU and other lawyers at the time who said that those contests could very well violate public accomodations laws covering sexual orientation in any jurisdictions in America, state and local, where such laws include gays. And in lots of jurisdictions, they do.
So, Today Show, guess what? You may be about to get your asses sued for violating state and local civil rights laws.
New Brunswick ruling clears way for gay marriage
Last Updated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:20:01 EDT
CBC News
A New Brunswick judge has handed down a decision that opens the door to same-sex marriages in the province.
Court of the Queen's Bench Judge Judy Clendenning ruled in favour of four gay couples, who argued that New Brunswick's current definition of marriage violated their rights.
In a written decision handed down in Moncton on Thursday, she said the definition of civil marriage would have to be changed from a lawful union between a man and a woman to a lawful union "between two persons."
Alison Menard, the lawyer who represented the couples, said the effect of the ruling is that same-sex marriage can now be carried out in New Brunswick.
"What it means is that anybody that meets the definition of capacity to marry is able to go and get a marriage licence," Menard said.
"So in this particular circumstance, couples of same gender will be able to obtain marriage licences and celebrate marriages."
The ruling leaves P.E.I., Alberta and the Northwest Territories as the last jurisdictions in the country that do not recognize same-sex marriage.
It gives New Brunswick a 10-day grace period to get the new marriage definition into place.
Premier Bernard Lord has said he personally believes in the traditional view of marriage. But he said the province wouldn't put up a fight if the courts or Parliament ordered it to make a change.
Several church-based groups had applied for intervener status in the case to argue against same-sex unions.
But the judge turned them down, saying that her ruling would not prevent the churches from opting not to perform marriage ceremonies for gay couples.
Gay organizations hailed Clendenning's decision as a huge step forward.
"Homosexuals in our province are going to be less looked down upon," said Eldon Hay, who runs a support group for parents and families of gay people.
"Since the legislation will be changed, it means that gays and lesbians will be on an equal playing field. That's the big change."
Lost Sappho love poem published after 2,600 years
By Tim Castle Fri Jun 24, 2:51 PM ET
LONDON (Reuters) - A love poem written 2,600 years ago by Sappho, the greatest female poet of ancient Greece, was published on Friday for the first time since it was rediscovered last year.
Sappho's verses expressing love for her female companions on the Greek island of Lesbos have either shocked or delighted generations of readers ever since they were first composed.
Her works once filled nine volumes and the ancients called her the "tenth muse," but little has survived to modern times.
The 12-line poem, only the fourth to have been recovered, was found on papyrus wrapped around an Egyptian mummy. It was published with an English translation in the Times Literary Supplement.
"She obviously had emotional relationships with women of her circle, quite possibly sexual," the poem's translator, Oxford University academic Martin West, told Reuters.
"They seem to have had some sort of society in which they could be in each other's company quite a lot, rather cut off from men," he said. "But the were clearly able to have plenty of fun."
The poem was rediscovered last year after researchers at Germany's Cologne University identified a papyrus once wrapped round a mummy as part of a 3rd century BC roll containing poems by Sappho.
They noticed that some of the verse fragments on the crumbling Cologne material matched parts of lines already identified as Sappho's on a papyrus discovered in 1922.
By combining the two they were able to reconstruct the original, adding likely missing words in the gaps that remained.
In the newly published verses, originally sung to music, Sappho laments the passing of time as she compares the youthful bodies of dancing girls to her own weak knees and white hair.
The first four lines of the translated verses read:
"You for the fragrant-bosomed Muses' lovely gifts,
Be zealous, girls, and the clear melodious lyre:
But my once tender body old age now
Has seized; my hair's turned white instead of dark."
(How many of us picture Tara's lovely back, in Restless, or Xena's birthday gift to Gabrielle in Many Happy Returns?)Canada Lawmakers OK Gay Marriage Bill
By BETH DUFF-BROWN, Associated Press Writer 10 minutes ago
TORONTO - Canada's House of Commons voted Tuesday to legalize gay marriage, passing landmark legislation that would grant all same-sex couples in Canada the same legal rights as those in traditional unions between a man and a woman.
The bill passed as expected, despite opposition from Conservatives and religious leaders. The legislation drafted by Prime Minister Paul Martin's minority Liberal Party government was also expected to easily pass the Senate and become federal law by the end of July.
The Netherlands and Belgium are the only other two nations that allow gay marriage nationwide.
Some of Martin's Liberal lawmakers voted against the bill, and his Cabinet minister for economic development in Ontario, Joe Comuzzi, resigned Tuesday over the legislation. But enough allies rallied to support the bill that has been debated for months.
Martin said he regretted losing Comuzzi, but praised Tuesday's vote as a necessary step for human rights.
"We are a nation of minorities," Martin said. "And in a nation of minorities, it is important that you don't cherry pick rights."
There are an estimated 34,000 gay and lesbian couples in Canada, according to government statistics. Before the measure passed, gay marriage was legal in seven provinces.
"This is a victory for Canadian values," said Alex Munter, national coordinator of Canadians for Equal Marriage, a group that has led the debate for the legislation.
Martin, a Roman Catholic, has said that despite anyone's personal beliefs, all Canadians should be granted the same rights to marriage.
Churches have expressed concern that their clergy would be compelled by law to perform same-sex ceremonies, with couples taking them to court or human rights tribunals if refused. The legislation, however, states that the bill only covers civil unions, not religious ones, and no clergy would be forced to perform same-sex ceremonies unless they choose to do so.
The Roman Catholic Church, the predominant Christian denomination in Canada, has vigorously opposed the legislation, saying that it would harm children in particular.
"Families with both mothers and fathers are generally better for children than those with only mothers or only fathers," Calgary Bishop Frederick Henry said in a recent statement.
The debate in Canada began in December, when the Supreme Court ruled that passage of same-sex legislation would not violate the constitution.
According to most polls, a majority of Canadians supports the right for gays and lesbians to marry. In the United States, gay marriage is opposed by a majority of Americans, according to an Associated Press-Ipsos poll taken in November, shortly after constitutional amendments in 11 states to ban same-sex marriage were approved.
Massachusetts is the only state that allows gay marriages; Vermont and Connecticut have approved same-sex civil unions.
Roberta Sklar, spokeswoman for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force in Washington, D.C., said same-sex American couples applaud Canadians.
"We know that it has been somewhat contentious in Canada, but at the same time the Canadians have largely approached this issue in a rational and democratic way and are providing a very positive model for the rest of the world," Sklar said.
Though hundreds of foreigners have come to Canada to seek civil ceremonies since gay marriages were first allowed in Ontario and British Columbia in 2003, not all countries or states recognize the unions. While a slew of Israeli men were married in Toronto City Hall earlier this year, for example, the Israeli Interior Ministry does not recognize those unions.
In the United States, the federal government does not recognize same-sex marriage and most states refuse to acknowledge marriage certificates from gay and lesbian couples, regardless of where they wed.

It was the sort of confession that a decade ago might have been scribbled in a teenager's diary, then quietly tucked away in a drawer: "Somewhat recently," wrote a boy who identified himself only as Zach, 16, from Tennessee, on his personal Web page, "I told my parents I was gay." He noted, "This didn't go over very well," and "They tell me that there is something psychologically wrong with me, and they 'raised me wrong.' "
Physical contact among clients other than a handshake is forbidden, and so is "campy" talk or behavior, according to program rules that Zach posted on his blog before he began at Refuge. Occasionally, recalled Jeff Harwood, 41, a Love in Action graduate who still considers himself gay, some participants would mock the mandatory football games.
"Their identities are still in flux," said Dr. Jack Drescher, the chairman of the committee on gay, lesbian and bisexual issues of the American Psychiatric Association, which in 2000 formally rejected regimens like reparative or conversion therapy as scientifically unproven. "One serious risk for the parent to consider is that most of the people who undergo these treatments don't change. That means that most people who go through these experiences often come out feeling worse than when they went in."
Posted on Fri, Jul. 15, 2005
Gay-rights opponent Santorum stands by outed aide
BY STEVE GOLDSTEIN
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - (KRT) - The senior spokesman for Sen. Rick Santorum, R- Pa., Friday confirmed to a web log that he is gay.
According to PageOneQ, an online gay and lesbian publication, director of communications Robert L. Traynham, said that he was an "out gay man who completely supports the senator."
Santorum, the third-ranking Republican in the Senate leadership has been an outspoken opponent of homosexual rights and a leading proponent of a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.
Santorum, who was traveling in Pittsburgh, released the following statement:
"Robert Traynham ... is widely respected and admired on Capitol Hill, both among the press corps and among the congressional staff, as a communications professional. Not only is Mr. Traynham an exemplary staffer, but he is also a trusted friend confidente to me and my family. Mr. Traynham is a valued member of my staff and I regret that this effort on behalf of people who oppose me has made him a target of bigotry in their eyes.
"It is entirely unacceptable that my staffs' personal lives are considered fair game by partisans looking for arguments to bolster my opponent's campaign. Mr. Traynham continues to have my full support and confidence as well as my prayers as he navigates this rude and mean spirited invasion of his personal life."
Mark Rodgers, chief of staff at the Republican conference, which Santorum chairs, said, "Robert is a tremendous employee and we're all for standing by him." Traynham's homosexuality was not news to the senator or his staff, he added.
In the online interview, Traynham defended his decision to work with the senator. "Sen. Santorum is a man of principle, he is a man who sticks up for what he believes in. I strongly do support Sen. Santorum.
Asked whether he supported Santorum's views on lesbian and gay issues, Traynham told PageOneQ, "Sen. Santorum is a family man. I have been with him for eight years and I am very proud to be with him."
The two-term senator is up for reelection next year. His expected Democratic opponent is State Treasurer Robert P. Casey, Jr.
Traynham began working for Santorum since 1997 as a press assistant and then deputy press secretary. He was press secretary for the senator's 2000 reelection campaign in Pennsylvania. Just prior to becoming communications director in the Senate office, Traynham served as director of communications for the Senate Republican Conference.
Traynham holds a bachelor of arts degree in political science from Cheyney University of Pennsylvania, where he currently serves on the Council of Trustees.
In supporting the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would prohibit gay marriage, Santorum has equated homeland security with the sanctity of traditional marriage. He has referred to gay marriage as "messing with the basic family unit."
During an interview with The Associated Press two years ago about a challenge to the constitutionality of Texas's sodomy law, Santorum said that if the Supreme Court allows gay sex at home (which it ultimately did), "you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything."
On the marriage issue, Santorum also said: "In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be."
---
© 2005, The Philadelphia Inquirer.
The lipstick lesbian daring to confront radical imams
by John in DC - 7/17/2005 10:12:00 PM
I went to a talk this woman gave in DC at the New America Foundation. Fascinating woman. And a really fascinating interview with her in the Sunday Times of London.
A snippet:
Irshad Manji has already been dubbed ‘Osama’s worst nightmare’ for her criticisms of Islam. Now she wants Britain’s Muslims to stand more firmly on the side of freedom.
No wonder Irshad Manji has received death threats since appearing on British television: she is a lipstick lesbian, a Muslim and scourge of Islamic leaders, whom she accuses of making excuses about the terror attacks on London. Oh, and she tells ordinary Muslims to “crawl out of their narcissistic shell”. Ouch....
Doesn’t the violent Muslim minority show Islam is flawed? “I ask myself the same question,” she grimaces. Far from regarding Muslims as oppressed they have a “supremacy complex — and that’s dangerous”. This, she contends, is true even among moderates. “Literalists” who consider the Koran the “perfect manifesto of God” have taken over the mainstream; and far from misreading Islam, as Tony Blair and the Muslim Council of Britain insist, terrorists can find encouragement for murder in the Koran.
The underlying problem with Islam, observes Manji, is that far from spiritualising Arabia, it has been infected with the reactionary prejudices of the Middle East: “Colonialism is not the preserve of people with pink skin. What about Islamic imperialism? Eighty per cent of Muslims live outside the Arab world yet all Muslims must bow to Mecca.” Fresh thinking, she contends, is suppressed by ignorant imams; you can see why she has been dubbed “Osama’s worst nightmare ”.
“The good news,” she insists, “is it doesn’t have to be like this.” She wants a reformation in Islam, returning it to its clever, fun-loving roots. “The world’s first ‘feminist’ was an 11th-century Muslim man. Baghdad had one of the first universities in the 9th century; the Spanish ‘Ole!’ comes from ‘Allah’; Islam even gave us the guitar.”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests