Skip to content


GLBT News

The place for kittens to discuss GLBT (gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgendered) issues as well as topics that don't fit in the other forums. (Some topics are off-topic in every forum on the board. Please read the FAQs.)

Re: GLBT News

Postby FineyMcFine » Thu Jun 09, 2005 3:08 pm

Judge William Pryor was confirmed today in the Senate in a 53-45 vote. Three Republicans crossed party lines to vote against his confirmation - Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, and Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine. Two Democrats also crossed over - Ben Nelson of Florida and Ken Salazar of Colorado. Two Senators did not vote - Jim Jeffords of Vermont and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

It's pretty unusual for Republicans to cross party lines on judicial confirmation votes like this so it's a decent sign of things to come on the eventual Supreme Court vote we'll face.

Pryor was arguably the most anti-GLBT judge to be nominated this year. Kittens who live in Rhode Island and Maine, it would be super to take a moment to call Chafee, Collins, and Snowe to thank them for voting against Pryor's confirmation. They're going to take a lot of flak from the other side.

Chafee: 202-224-2921
Collins: 202-224-2523
Snowe: 202-224-5344

Here's a press release about the confirmation vote:

Link
User avatar
FineyMcFine
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: USA


Re: GLBT News

Postby Gatito Grande » Thu Jun 09, 2005 9:40 pm

Pryor on the Federal Court for life strains my commitment to nonviolence to its limit, that's for sure. :happy

GG Though if "the Lord wanted to call him home" early, I don't think I'd be TOO heartbroken by it Out

Yeah-yeah-yeah: far BETTER that he have a "Road of Damascus" type experience, and come to the shocking-shocking! realization that we LGBTs are people, too. :pride Miracles still happen? :pray
User avatar
Gatito Grande
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2609
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Michigan


Re: GLBT News

Postby sam7777 » Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:29 am

I have long thought that the Republican anti-GLBT hate campaign was analogous to that of the Nazis against the jews (since I read Claudia Koontz's "The Nazi Conscience"). This is not to diminish in any way the horror of the Holocaust but only to point to the danger's that GLBT folks face in the shrub's America. The Matthew Shepard Online Resources has the quotes:
http://www.hatecrime.org/subpages/hitler/hitler.html
Matthew Shepard Online Resources
Nazi Anti-Jewish Speech
VS.
Religious Right Anti-Gay Speech

"When you say...you [gay Americans] are not a group of people who need special protection. You do well economically. You are an elite. That is precisely the argument that has been made in behalf of the worst kind of discrimination against Jewish people."
- United States Senator Paul Wellstone, July 29, 1994 -
Responding to a religious right spokesman's anti-gay testimony
I won't print the hate quotes because they are sickening. Check out the links above for the vitriol when you can stomache it. Let's hope we can get a new president that does not pander to the religious right. Given the revelations in the Downing Street memo, Bush should be impeached but that can't happen without taking control of congress in 2006. IMHO for GLBT folks this is a matter of survival and I hope more will look at the quotes above and give the repugs fewer gay votes than they got in 2004.
sam7777
 


Sweet 'n' sour

Postby Ben Varkentine » Sat Jun 11, 2005 6:16 pm

This is sweet:

http://dedspace.blogspot.com/2005/06/it ... er-to.html

Someone painted God Hates Fags on the school rock at Howell High School, and a graduating student, Shayla Kamiliar, got her friends together to paint over the hate graffiti. They spray-painted the rock, then wrote Love all over a number of pieces of school property. They have been accused of vandalism (which is, of course, what they perpetrated, in the form of civil disobedience), suspended from class, and barred from the graduation ceremony.

More than two hundred students protested the punishment, and one of the parents decided to put together a backyard ceremony for the group's three graduating seniors. That ceremony has now been moved to a football field. A teacher will address the three graduates and their friends, the valedictorian will come by and give his speech again, and the superintendent is making sure the grads have caps and gowns.


This is sour...but with a little bit of sweetness again at the end:

http://www.mikeditto.com/archives/kudos ... _coalition

A Tennessee-based religious organization euphemistically called “Love in Action” is running a brainwashing camp for gay kids.

Among the camp’s practices, posted on the blog of a youth whose parents are forcing him to attend:

Kids in the program are not allowed to speak to anyone, not even their parents, for at least the first two days.

Kids are not allowed to go anywhere unless they are accompanied by at least two other participants, one of which has to have at least 8 weeks of prior indoctrination.

Kids are not allowed to keep a journal or a diary

Kids are not allowed to discuss what goes on in the program with anyone, not even their parents

Kids are not allowed to have contact with any family members other than parents, who also go through the program

Kids are not allowed to have any physical contact with any human being other than a hand shake or a pat on the shoulder, and only when authorized.

Kids are not allowed outside of a small geographic area within Memphis, even if accompanied by parents, without prior written authorization

Kids are not allowed to listen to any music that is not explicitly Christian (Bach and Beethoven are specifically forbidden as being non-Christian)

Kids are not permitted to enter restaurants that serve alcohol

Kids are not allowed to speak after 9:00 p.m. under any circumstance

Kids may be placed in a state of isolation where they are not allowed to communicate with one another

Ex-gay programs, however misguided, are fine for consenting adults who for whatever reason think they want to change their sexual orientation (despite zero proof that it is even possible). This program is administered to minors against their will. It is forced indoctrination, including dehumanizing, degrading treatment. I really hope some civil liberties types will get clued into this and put a stop to it.

In the mean time, a local group of gays and lesbians (largely kids themselves) is orchestrating a protest outside of this cult-like establishment every day for the next two weeks. Kudos to them. If I were within a reasonable distance I would be right there with them. The protest has garnered some local media coverage, and the story is heating up in the blogosphere. Let’s put an end to this outrageous treatment of innocent kids.

In the latest post on the Queer Action coalition blog, they posted a precis of an interview that they did with a former participant in the program, who outlined activities such as:

[…] “shaming sessions”, where the clients have to, once a day, describe in emotional detail “sinful activities” they’d partaken in…these sessions were then extended to having to describe these things in front of 50 or 60 people on “friends and family” nights, where the family was encouraged to shame them, not be supportive.

This is “love” in action.

Note: The blog from the youth whose parents are forcing him to go to this camp hasn’t been updated since before the camp started. Reading the comments, however, you will find updates from his friends who are sort of spying on him and showing up “accidentally” here and there so that he knows he is being supported from the outside.


ETA: The Tennessee Guerilla Women blog has an update; lots of links in the post proper, excerpts below.

http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/200 ... s-gay.html

The Queer Action Coalition reports that Monday's demonstration was the largest yet. Two psychiatrists showed up, as well as a former victim of the Love in Action brainwashing camp. The Republic of T has a better name for the camp: Camp Hetero Horror.

Mike Ditto at Janus Online points out the similarities between Camp Hetero Horror and cults.

Andrew Sullivan says if you can't be there to Act-Up, "you can send your moral support to the abused kid here. Blogs can be oases of freedom in totalitarian societies, and also in fundamentalist boot camps."

Zach now has almost 500 supportive comments on his last post. He has not been able to blog since his arrival at the camp. Reading the comments makes me feel better about the deplorable state of our species, so I'm posting a few of them here, in case it makes you feel better too. There are also some good ideas, or things we can do that might help Zach.


Hi, Zach: Your story has hit the blogosphere like a ton of bricks. Andrew Sullivan mentioned you the other day, and so have a lot of other writers -- including me. I'm a journalist working in the LGBT print and radio sectors. I've been on my email all day letting editors and broadcasters know about your story. Love in Action has received a lot of negative press in the past because of its cruel treatment of its clients, and the brainwashing techniques it employs.. Please remember that you have done nothing wrong, no matter what you have been told. Please also remember that God is a Being of compassion, mercy and forgiveness. No one acting in His name would ever hurt you like this.
Posted by Crow


I'm here for you all the way. Keep your chin up. When you get out, if you need a place to go, I have a spare bed. I'm in Dallas, so that might be a bit far for you, but if you need somewhere to go, just email me. We're all here for you. Much love.
Posted by Hannah


I just submitted the story and some relevant info to the ACLU. I hope anyone else who reads this does the same so that they'll pick it up and do something. Child abuse should never be tolerated.
Posted by Chris


It occurs to me that if the Brainwashing In Action people discover the existence of all these comments supporting Zach, they might try to persuade his parents to have his account shut down for fear of actually, you know, all these comments making Zach feel like he's a good person the way he is, or something. I have therefore saved all the comment pages (up through comment 377) to text files -- strictly text files, no pics or links or anything -- just so he can read them all in case something happens to his account.
Posted by mike


Zach spoke of suicide in his last post:

"I'm not a suicidal person... really I'm not.. I think it's stupid - really. But.. I can't help it, no im not going to commit suicide, all I can think about is killing my mother and myself. It's so horrible. This is what it's doing to me... I have this horrible feeling all of the time... I wish this on no person... I'm so satisfied--happy's too strong of a word the state I'm in-- that everyone's taking the time to email and write letters in complaint to these people. I dont know if it will do anything, but if something did happen it would be -- awesome."

A Massachusetts survey of high school gays found that 40% reported they had attempted suicide. Zach is going to need all the support he can get when he gets out of Camp Hetero Horror.

It only takes a couple of minutes to set up an account and leave a comment on his blog.
Ben

House: "Another life saved by girl-on-girl action."
User avatar
Ben Varkentine
5. Willowhand
 
Posts: 316
Topics: 1
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:12 pm
Location: Seattle


Canadian Armed Forces - First Gay Wedding

Postby MemsMapper » Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:44 pm

From the Globe and Mail, 2005 June 14

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ ... ory/Front/

Canadian Forces sees first gay wedding

Tuesday, June 14, 2005 Updated at 4:04 PM EDT

Canadian Press

Halifax — The Canadian military is marking its first gay wedding.

Two men, who do not want to be identified, exchanged vows in a small ceremony at Canadian Forces Base Greenwood in western Nova Scotia.

It was the first time the military has presided over a same-sex union after introducing guidelines in 2003 dealing with the contentious issue.

The two men, one a sergeant, the other a warrant officer, were married last month by a United Church minister because the base chaplain is Anglican and couldn't officiate.

But, Lt-Cmdr. David Greenwood helped arrange the service and preached at it.

He says it might encourage other gays and lesbians in the military to come forward and make their vows official.

A spokeswoman with National Defence confirmed it was the first wedding for a gay couple in the military's history.

The department's guidelines say same-sex couples must be treated like heterosexuals.

The Nova Scotia Supreme Court ruled last September that banning same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.


Meanwhile, the governing Liberals must survive another budget confidence vote tonight (they are expected to do so), before the Gay Marriage bill moves any further in the House.
We must begin somewhere or we will never begin at all.
The absence of small beginnings will spell the end.
-- Margaret Atwood
User avatar
MemsMapper
2. Floating Rose
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada


Re: GLBT News

Postby FineyMcFine » Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:57 pm

Two bills will soon be re-introduced in Congress of interest to the GLBT community. Urge your Representative to become an original co-sponsor of both (the more Reps who have signed on by the time the bill is actually introduced, the stronger showing it makes and the more initial momentum it has. The links below will take you to HRC's Online Action Center.

1. The Uniting American Families Act

http://www.hrcactioncenter.org/campaign/uafa_house_urge

Formerly the Permanent Partners Immigration Act, the UAFA would allow US citizens to sponsor their same-sex partner for US residency. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) is the lead sponsor in the House.

2. The Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act

http://www.hrcactioncenter.org/campaign/dpbo_house_urge

This bill would allow employees of the federal government to cover their domestic partners under their health insurance plan, as legal, opposite-sex spouses are currently allowed to. Barney Frank (D-MA) is the lead sponsor in the House.
User avatar
FineyMcFine
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: USA


Gov. Mitt Romney backs new efforts to ban Mass gay marriage

Postby FineyMcFine » Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:21 am

From the Boston Globe:

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/06/17/romney_backs_new_effort_to_prohibit_gay_marriages/

Romney backs new effort to prohibit gay marriages
Proposal for ballot excludes civil unions

By Raphael Lewis, Globe Staff | June 17, 2005

Governor Mitt Romney yesterday endorsed a grass-roots effort to pass a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in Massachusetts in 2008, abandoning his support for what he called a ''muddied" compromise measure that would also ban gay marriages but allow gays to enter into civil unions.

Romney, who is courting conservative voters for a possible presidential run in 2008, said the newly proposed ban would give voters a chance to consider a ''clean, straightforward, unambiguous amendment" that does not include civil unions.

''I'm concerned that the amendment currently under consideration by the Legislature is somewhat confused or muddied by the combination of two things: One is the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman, which I support, and the other is the requirement that there be civil unions in the Commonwealth, which is a provision I do not support," Romney told reporters after a group of same-sex marriage opponents unveiled the new proposed amendment in a separate press conference.

In announcing their plans to back a new proposed amendment, opponents of same-sex marriage said they believe that the compromise amendment before the Legislature would be defeated because conservative lawmakers who had backed it last year would join them to support the new alternative that simply bans gay marriage.

The Legislature is expected to meet in Constitutional Convention this fall to take up the compromise amendment, which was sponsored by Senate President Robert E. Travaglini and Senate Republican leader Brian P. Lees.

''The convention has defeated the Travaglini-Lees amendment today," said state Representative Philip Travis, Democrat of Rehoboth, addressing more than 100 backers of the proposed amendment at a State House press conference.

Travis was the only lawmaker to speak at the unveiling of the amendment yesterday. Joining him were representatives of the Massachusetts Family Institute, and a host of Christian leaders, including a representative of the four dioceses of the Roman Catholic Church in Massachusetts. The ballot committee calls itself Voteonmarriage.org.

To amend the state constitution via a citizens' ballot initiative, organizers will need to gather the signatures of roughly 66,000 Massachusetts voters this fall, then win the backing of one quarter of the Legislature's 200 members in two successive sessions, and then win at the ballot box in the November 2008 election. By contrast, the compromise amendment, which was generated by the Legislature, requires a majority vote of lawmakers in two successive sessions to be sent to voters.

Yesterday's developments were a dramatic new turn in the state's political debate around gay marriage, which was legalized by the Supreme Judicial Court in a Nov. 18, 2003 decision. In March, a Boston Globe poll indicated that 56 percent of those surveyed supported same-sex marriage.

Reflecting the uneasiness among politicians over same-sex marriage, last spring the Legislature passed the Travaglini-Lees amendment to ban gay marriage but allow civil unions. It cleared by just five votes. At the time, Romney urged Republicans to back the measure because it was the only one put forth by lawmakers that had a chance of passing.

Travis said his coalition of steadfast gay-marriage opponents in the Legislature included at least a half-dozen lawmakers. If they decide the new amendment is preferable, they would probably vote against the compromise measure and help end its chances of heading to the 2006 ballot if other lawmakers maintain their positions from last year.

Gay-marriage advocates and several lawmakers interviewed yesterday said they were not convinced that the Travaglini-Lees amendment would be defeated.

Lees agreed that the landscape had changed with the announcement of the proposed gay-marriage ban, but said the course ahead was not certain.

''It will change the number of votes -- there's no doubt about that -- and the Senate president and I are going to have to look and see what the options are out there," Lees said, referring to the alternative ballot question. ''We'll have to sit down after the budget's done and figure out what course of action, if any, we want to take."

Arline Isaacson, cochairwoman of the Massachusetts Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus, said she was skeptical of Travis's prediction that some conservatives would abandon the Travaglini-Lees measure. ''It's possible, but I wouldn't bet my mortgage on it," said Isaacson, who has been urging the Legislature to defeat the compromise this year.

Referring to the text of the compromise amendment, Kristian Mineau of the Massachusetts Family Institute, a Newton-based group that opposes gay marriage, said, ''Asking citizens to vote on the Travaglini-Lees amendment is like asking them to vote for George Bush and John Kerry on the same ticket."

The new amendment and Romney's endorsement were criticized by gay activists and by Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for governor in 2006.

''I'm opposed to any effort to take away the rights of gay and lesbian couples to marry," Reilly said in a statement. ''It is unfortunate that the Governor's preoccupation with matters outside of Massachusetts dictate that he play politics with an issue that has been resolved and is working well."

The coalition backing the new amendment includes 20 state and national groups, including the Washington, D.C.-based Family Research Council, Colorado-based Focus on the Family, and the Massachusetts Catholic Conference, which is the lobbying arm of the four Roman Catholic dioceses in the state. Many of the national groups involved are pivotal to the hopes of any Republican presidential aspirant.

In February, Romney told a South Carolina Republican audience that ''from day one, I've opposed the move for same-sex marriage and its equivalent, civil unions." But gay rights groups, including a leading GOP organization, accused Romney of flip-flopping, saying he had supported some benefits for gay couples in his 2002 campaign. He had also urged lawmakers in 2004 to back the compromise amendment.

Yesterday, Rick Beltram, who heads the Spartanburg County, S.C., Republican Party, said Romney's decision to back the new amendment would play well with crucial GOP voters in his state, some of whom are skeptical of a Massachusetts Republican. ''This will continue to reinforce in potential voters down here that he's a real conservative," Beltram said.

But Romney also drew a criticism that he was playing to a national conservative audience.

''As the governor considers a run for president in 2008, he has bowed to right-wing pressure to eliminate even the most basic rights for same-sex families in Massachusetts," said a statement released by the Washington-based Human Rights Campaign, which supports gay marriage.

Another analysis came from Dan Schnur, a Republican consultant in California who served as spokesman for Governor Pete Wilson and communications director for Arizona Senator John McCain's presidential campaign in 2000. He said Romney was engaging in a time-honored political tradition of ''changing his language on an issue without changing his position."

''Just as John Kerry talked about the war in Iraq much differently in the Democratic primary than during the general election, that's what Mitt Romney is doing," Schnur said.

Romney, who recently opposed a Democrat-sponsored stem cell research bill, has again found himself aligned with the four Massachusetts bishops of the Roman Catholic church. The bishops issued a statement saying they were giving their permission for the ballot committee to gather signatures outside Catholic churches.

''This proposed amendment restores to our laws the traditional definition of marriage," the bishops' statement said. ''To remain effective as society's primary institution for ensuring the well-being of children, marriage must be understood by government as a commitment involving one man and one woman."

But a religious leader who listened in on the ballot committee's press conference criticized the tone of the organizers.

''I lived outside Montgomery, Ala., in 1963, and the people there were convinced that government was forcing its agenda on them to enfranchise blacks," said the Rev. Jep Streit, dean of St. Paul's Episcopal Cathedral in Boston. ''They said it was outrageous that the will of the people was opposed. The rhetoric sounds the same to me."
User avatar
FineyMcFine
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: USA


Re: GLBT News

Postby Gatito Grande » Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:47 pm

I think this is very encouraging. Not only does it show our opponents for the slime they are, but it means that, w/o a vote until 2008 (at the earliest), it means three more years of same-sex marriages, and lo, the sky hasn't fallen! :applause

GG "In March, a Boston Globe poll indicated that 56 percent of those surveyed supported same-sex marriage." I believe support is only going to RISE, as will ire at the shennigans (Hey, we're among Celtic fans! *g*) of the phobes. Out

And this is all being organized from the Christian Right *outside* of the Bay State. I can hear it now, slogan against the amendment: "Hands Off Massachusetts!"
User avatar
Gatito Grande
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2609
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Michigan


Re: GLBT News

Postby singgirl » Sat Jun 18, 2005 6:40 am

Ben Varkentine I recently read an article from PlanetOut.com

Sixteen-year-old "Zach" is apparently enduring a rite of passage still too common for gay youth: His parents say he must change. When they enrolled him last month in a Christian camp-like program to turn him straight, he documented his fears in his online diary, or blog.

The PlanetOut Network could not confirm Zach's identity or his story, but the blog has sparked a firestorm of protest against the program, known as Refuge, and renewed scrutiny of similar "ministries."

A residential program run by Memphis, Tenn.-based Love in Action (LIA), Refuge "ministers to adolescents struggling with broken and addictive behaviors, such as promiscuity, alcohol and drug addiction and homosexuality," according to its Web site.

An estimated total of 150 people -- including parents, children, psychiatrists and other concerned Memphis residents carrying signs that have slogans such as "This is Child Abuse" -- have gathered over eight consecutive days outside LIA headquarters. On Thursday LIA held a press conference in response to the protests.

For LIA, homosexuality is not an orientation but a set of behaviors that lies at the root of all dysfunction. And homosexual desires can supposedly be reprogrammed, through Refuge, at a cost of $2,000 for two weeks, or $4,000 for six weeks.

Patterned after teen drug and alcohol programs, Refuge minimizes contact with familiar things that it claims encourage homosexual behavior: no secular music, no more than 15 minutes per day behind a closed bathroom door, no contact with any practicing homosexuals, no masturbation, no secular music, and -- for reasons not explained -- no Calvin Klein underwear.

The rules above were posted on Zach's blog, which has been inactive since June 3. The policies were confirmed by Alex Polotsky, a spokesman for Queer Action Coalition, a Memphis group formed to provide alternative information for struggling youth.

"Nobody can be straight enough in the program," said Polotsky, whose group staged the protests outside LIA. "We're outraged at the treatment youths receive [in Refuge]."

Exodus International, an umbrella organization for nearly all regional "ex-gay" ministries, provides funding and marketing support for groups such as LIA, Lifeguard Ministries, New Hope Ministries and others. Although "reparative therapy" for homosexuality has been denounced by the mainstream psychological community as tantamount to abuse, "ex-gay" ministries offer hope to conflicted parents (usually devoutly religious and conservative) who are unwilling or unable to accept their kids' sexuality or seek traditional counseling.

Youth (and adults) who enter "ex-gay" programs may suffer from genuine self-destructive behaviors that go far beyond their struggle with same-sex attraction, said Wayne Besen, who wrote the book "Anything But Straight" about the "ex-gay" movement.

"To get help they have to swallow the lie that it's because they are gay that they're having these problems. It works by confusing people. It doesn't matter to them that they don't get results. They get a lot of money from people who really believe this stuff."

"Love in Action seems to be the worst of these reckless religious activities," said Craig Bowman, executive director of the National Youth Advocacy Coalition. "These programs are dangerous because they systematically work on a young person's psyche using junk science as a foundation."

Jack Drescher, M.D., a New York-based psychiatrist and chair of the American Psychiatric Association Committee on LGBT Issues, told the PlanetOut Network that such programs do far more harm than good for impressionable teens. "They may delay the child's coming out for many years, but by the time they are ready to come out, there's been a lot of psychological damage."

Shawn O'Donnell spent eight years in and out of therapy to change his sexual orientation. As a depressed and suicidal 18-year-old, O'Donnell was referred by his pastor to a three-year residential program, New Hope Ministry, located 10 miles from San Francisco. O'Donnell said it only made his issues worse.

"It was hell, very controlling. We couldn't be alone. We were always told to pray harder, and it made us feel ashamed that we weren't using the program correctly," he recalled.

Peterson Toscano spent 17 years and $30,000 to get straight as an adult, but nothing worked. Now a "performance activist" in Connecticut, Toscano has toured the United States and Europe with a satirical theater piece about his two years in LIA.

"'Ex-gay' programs use the term 'gay lifestyle,' which to them includes unsafe sex [and] emotionally dependent relationships," Toscano said. "They know they can't really turn anyone straight, but they can make them not live the 'gay lifestyle.' They are purposely deceiving people."

Though relatively few people participate in 'ex-gay' programs, Drescher believes their influence goes far beyond changing individuals. "They are a pawn in the culture war," he said. "They support the idea that homosexuality can be changed, therefore it is a lifestyle and not worthy of civil rights legislation."

Drescher pointed to an 'ex-gay' convention called Love Won Out, organized by the anti-gay Focus on the Family and held in Texas to coincide with the state legislature's biennial sessions.

"The timing is not a coincidence," he said. "Their purpose is to shape public policy."


Pax!
User avatar
singgirl
11. Fish in the Bowl
 
Posts: 1368
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, US


"Today Show" anti-gay contest quite likely illegal

Postby Ben Varkentine » Wed Jun 22, 2005 3:24 pm

Found on Americablog:

Dear "Today Show," your anti-gay contest is quite likely illegal
by John in DC - 6/22/2005 12:09:00 PM

UPDATE: Today Show's email. You know what to do. today@nbc.com

NBC's Today Show is offering a wedding contest where the lucky winners get a wedding and honeymoon thrown by the Today Show. Great! Except that the rules explicitly ban gay couples from winning.

Check out what the contest rules say:

each couple submitting a completed application form must consist of a male and a female, each of whom is at least 21 years of age as of June 13, 2005;


(Gee. Wonder how NBC feels about inter-racial couples?)

First, uh, bigot much? The marriage of gays is legal in Massachusetts, so where does the Today Show get off banning gay couples?

Second, uh, lawsuit much? I researched a similar issue extensively a few years back - remember Sandals resorts that used to ban gay couples, well a number of US companies were offering contests where the prizes were a trip to Sandals, but the contests banned gay couples. I talked to the ACLU and other lawyers at the time who said that those contests could very well violate public accomodations laws covering sexual orientation in any jurisdictions in America, state and local, where such laws include gays. And in lots of jurisdictions, they do.

So, Today Show, guess what? You may be about to get your asses sued for violating state and local civil rights laws.
Ben

House: "Another life saved by girl-on-girl action."
User avatar
Ben Varkentine
5. Willowhand
 
Posts: 316
Topics: 1
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:12 pm
Location: Seattle


Re: GLBT News

Postby WebWarlock » Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:34 pm

Looks like Today changed their rules.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8131990/

I say G/L couples should en masse hit up Today.

Warlock
Web Warlock, web.warlock@comcast.net
Visit my Willow and Tara page! http://timbrannan.blogspot.com/p/willow-tara.html
Tara: "My whole life has been 'Tara, don't use your magic.' 'Tara, hide your powers.' 'Tara you will scare someone.' But you tried to hurt and then kill Willow. So maybe it is time I showed everyone just how powerful I am."
- The Dragon and the Phoenix, Episode 7: The Road to Hell
User avatar
WebWarlock
28. Com...plete
 
Posts: 4706
Topics: 12
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 1:36 pm
Location: Chicago, IL


Re: GLBT News

Postby FineyMcFine » Thu Jun 23, 2005 2:44 pm

HRC's Equality Update Newsletter for June 2005 is new today and posted here:

http://www.hrcactioncenter.org/actioncenter/notice-description.tcl?newsletter_id=3374079
Last edited by FineyMcFine on Tue Jul 12, 2005 7:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
FineyMcFine
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: USA


Re: GLBT News

Postby MemsMapper » Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:21 am

From the CBC website:

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national ... 50623.html

New Brunswick ruling clears way for gay marriage
Last Updated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:20:01 EDT
CBC News

A New Brunswick judge has handed down a decision that opens the door to same-sex marriages in the province.

Court of the Queen's Bench Judge Judy Clendenning ruled in favour of four gay couples, who argued that New Brunswick's current definition of marriage violated their rights.

In a written decision handed down in Moncton on Thursday, she said the definition of civil marriage would have to be changed from a lawful union between a man and a woman to a lawful union "between two persons."

Alison Menard, the lawyer who represented the couples, said the effect of the ruling is that same-sex marriage can now be carried out in New Brunswick.

"What it means is that anybody that meets the definition of capacity to marry is able to go and get a marriage licence," Menard said.

"So in this particular circumstance, couples of same gender will be able to obtain marriage licences and celebrate marriages."

The ruling leaves P.E.I., Alberta and the Northwest Territories as the last jurisdictions in the country that do not recognize same-sex marriage.

It gives New Brunswick a 10-day grace period to get the new marriage definition into place.

Premier Bernard Lord has said he personally believes in the traditional view of marriage. But he said the province wouldn't put up a fight if the courts or Parliament ordered it to make a change.

Several church-based groups had applied for intervener status in the case to argue against same-sex unions.

But the judge turned them down, saying that her ruling would not prevent the churches from opting not to perform marriage ceremonies for gay couples.

Gay organizations hailed Clendenning's decision as a huge step forward.

"Homosexuals in our province are going to be less looked down upon," said Eldon Hay, who runs a support group for parents and families of gay people.

"Since the legislation will be changed, it means that gays and lesbians will be on an equal playing field. That's the big change."


And in other news, the Canadian Parliament finally passed the Budget bill last night. That was the last chance for the opposition to defeat the government and have an election this summer. This session of Parliament has been extended, to allow for the Same-Sex Marriage bill to come to the House. That should happen early next week.
We must begin somewhere or we will never begin at all.
The absence of small beginnings will spell the end.
-- Margaret Atwood
User avatar
MemsMapper
2. Floating Rose
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada


Re: GLBT News

Postby WebWarlock » Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:06 pm

Some news, none of it good.

‘Healed’ by God: Evangelical group sponsors conference on nature of gays
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8234503/

2 charged with attacking lesbian couple
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/loca ... i-news-hed

Sorry.

Warlock
Web Warlock, web.warlock@comcast.net
Visit my Willow and Tara page! http://timbrannan.blogspot.com/p/willow-tara.html
Tara: "My whole life has been 'Tara, don't use your magic.' 'Tara, hide your powers.' 'Tara you will scare someone.' But you tried to hurt and then kill Willow. So maybe it is time I showed everyone just how powerful I am."
- The Dragon and the Phoenix, Episode 7: The Road to Hell
User avatar
WebWarlock
28. Com...plete
 
Posts: 4706
Topics: 12
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 1:36 pm
Location: Chicago, IL


Re: GLBT News

Postby Warduke » Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:54 am

From Yahoo...

Lost Sappho love poem published after 2,600 years

By Tim Castle Fri Jun 24, 2:51 PM ET


LONDON (Reuters) - A love poem written 2,600 years ago by Sappho, the greatest female poet of ancient Greece, was published on Friday for the first time since it was rediscovered last year.

Sappho's verses expressing love for her female companions on the Greek island of Lesbos have either shocked or delighted generations of readers ever since they were first composed.

Her works once filled nine volumes and the ancients called her the "tenth muse," but little has survived to modern times.

The 12-line poem, only the fourth to have been recovered, was found on papyrus wrapped around an Egyptian mummy. It was published with an English translation in the Times Literary Supplement.

"She obviously had emotional relationships with women of her circle, quite possibly sexual," the poem's translator, Oxford University academic Martin West, told Reuters.

"They seem to have had some sort of society in which they could be in each other's company quite a lot, rather cut off from men," he said. "But the were clearly able to have plenty of fun."

The poem was rediscovered last year after researchers at Germany's Cologne University identified a papyrus once wrapped round a mummy as part of a 3rd century BC roll containing poems by Sappho.

They noticed that some of the verse fragments on the crumbling Cologne material matched parts of lines already identified as Sappho's on a papyrus discovered in 1922.

By combining the two they were able to reconstruct the original, adding likely missing words in the gaps that remained.

In the newly published verses, originally sung to music, Sappho laments the passing of time as she compares the youthful bodies of dancing girls to her own weak knees and white hair.

The first four lines of the translated verses read:

"You for the fragrant-bosomed Muses' lovely gifts,

Be zealous, girls, and the clear melodious lyre:

But my once tender body old age now

Has seized; my hair's turned white instead of dark."
Warduke
 


Re: GLBT News

Postby Gatito Grande » Sat Jun 25, 2005 2:28 pm

Mmmmm, Sappho. :heart (How many of us picture Tara's lovely back, in Restless, or Xena's birthday gift to Gabrielle in Many Happy Returns?)

Thanks for posting this, Brian.

Here's another blurb, w/ a slightly longer extract from the poem (via the London Times Online)



Poem by Sappho discovered
By Adam Sherwin


A previously unknown poem by Sappho, the Ancient Greek poet, has been found on a scrap of papyrus. The poem, which reflects on growing old, is only the fourth known to have survived and was discovered last year as part of the covering of an Egyptian mummy.

The full 101-word poem, an extract from which is below, will be published in The Times Literary Supplement today, with a translation by Martin West, a renowned Greek scholar and Emeritus Fellow of All Souls, Oxford. Sappho, who wrote mainly love poems, was born on the island of Lesbos between 630 BC and 612 BC.


Extract: You for the fragrant- blossomed Muses’ lovely gifts be zealous, girls, and the clear
melodious lyre: but my once tender body old age now has seized; my
hair’s turned white instead of dark;
my heart’s grown heavy, my knees
will not support me, that once on
a time were fleet for the dance as fawns. This state I oft bemoan; but what’s to do? Not to grow old,
being human, there’s no way.


GG "Isle of Lesbos" (pun intended!) Out

[But in response to this bit, may I say, Sapph? "Before I go to meet my Maker, I'm gonna use the salt that's left in my shaker!" (Cole Porter)]

ETA: I just noticed, that the Times has "fragrant-blossomed Muses" while Yahoo has "fragrant-bosomed Muses". I vote for Yahoo's version!
User avatar
Gatito Grande
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2609
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Michigan


Re: GLBT News

Postby FineyMcFine » Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:31 pm

To all Texan kittens in the Austin area - vigil at at the Capitol on Friday evening to protest Gov. Perry's insulting comments about GLBT veterans in Texas. (Background, in early June Gov. Perry said that gay veterans should move out of the state, read the article here: http://www.washblade.com/thelatest/thelatest.cfm?blog_id=1006)

Progressive Patriotism
The Equality Vigil
Break out your patriotic finest – we’ll provide the flags.

This year, start your 4th of July weekend by joining gay and straight fair-minded Texans for a vigil at the Capitol. Veterans and the Color Guard will lead the way as we walk together to the Capitol to protest Governor Perry’s outrageous insult to Texas’ brave and heroic LGBT service members. We are also praying for added strength and hope for the thousands of LGBT individuals and families that would be harmed by passage of the shameful anti-gay constitutional amendment on the ballot in Texas this November.

When: Friday July 1, 2005, 5:15pm

Where: Wooldridge Park
Guadalupe between 9th and 10th Street
Gather at Wooldridge w/ family and friends to live music!

6:00 pm sharp
Color Guard procession to the Capitol for the vigil

For more information e-mail equalityvigil@aol.com or http://www.lgrl.org

Sponsored by the Austin Alliance for Social Justice & LGRL
User avatar
FineyMcFine
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: USA


Re: GLBT News

Postby seurat » Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:53 pm

Canada just became the latest country to make same-sex marriage legal. It passed 158-133. Parliament is good for something after all.
seurat
12. Recently Gay
 
Posts: 1599
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:36 pm
Location: toronto


Re: GLBT News

Postby singgirl » Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:32 pm

Canada Lawmakers OK Gay Marriage Bill
By BETH DUFF-BROWN, Associated Press Writer 10 minutes ago

TORONTO - Canada's House of Commons voted Tuesday to legalize gay marriage, passing landmark legislation that would grant all same-sex couples in Canada the same legal rights as those in traditional unions between a man and a woman.

The bill passed as expected, despite opposition from Conservatives and religious leaders. The legislation drafted by Prime Minister Paul Martin's minority Liberal Party government was also expected to easily pass the Senate and become federal law by the end of July.
The Netherlands and Belgium are the only other two nations that allow gay marriage nationwide.

Some of Martin's Liberal lawmakers voted against the bill, and his Cabinet minister for economic development in Ontario, Joe Comuzzi, resigned Tuesday over the legislation. But enough allies rallied to support the bill that has been debated for months.

Martin said he regretted losing Comuzzi, but praised Tuesday's vote as a necessary step for human rights.

"We are a nation of minorities," Martin said. "And in a nation of minorities, it is important that you don't cherry pick rights."

There are an estimated 34,000 gay and lesbian couples in Canada, according to government statistics. Before the measure passed, gay marriage was legal in seven provinces.

"This is a victory for Canadian values," said Alex Munter, national coordinator of Canadians for Equal Marriage, a group that has led the debate for the legislation.

Martin, a Roman Catholic, has said that despite anyone's personal beliefs, all Canadians should be granted the same rights to marriage.

Churches have expressed concern that their clergy would be compelled by law to perform same-sex ceremonies, with couples taking them to court or human rights tribunals if refused. The legislation, however, states that the bill only covers civil unions, not religious ones, and no clergy would be forced to perform same-sex ceremonies unless they choose to do so.

The Roman Catholic Church, the predominant Christian denomination in Canada, has vigorously opposed the legislation, saying that it would harm children in particular.

"Families with both mothers and fathers are generally better for children than those with only mothers or only fathers," Calgary Bishop Frederick Henry said in a recent statement.

The debate in Canada began in December, when the Supreme Court ruled that passage of same-sex legislation would not violate the constitution.

According to most polls, a majority of Canadians supports the right for gays and lesbians to marry. In the United States, gay marriage is opposed by a majority of Americans, according to an Associated Press-Ipsos poll taken in November, shortly after constitutional amendments in 11 states to ban same-sex marriage were approved.

Massachusetts is the only state that allows gay marriages; Vermont and Connecticut have approved same-sex civil unions.

Roberta Sklar, spokeswoman for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force in Washington, D.C., said same-sex American couples applaud Canadians.

"We know that it has been somewhat contentious in Canada, but at the same time the Canadians have largely approached this issue in a rational and democratic way and are providing a very positive model for the rest of the world," Sklar said.

Though hundreds of foreigners have come to Canada to seek civil ceremonies since gay marriages were first allowed in Ontario and British Columbia in 2003, not all countries or states recognize the unions. While a slew of Israeli men were married in Toronto City Hall earlier this year, for example, the Israeli Interior Ministry does not recognize those unions.

In the United States, the federal government does not recognize same-sex marriage and most states refuse to acknowledge marriage certificates from gay and lesbian couples, regardless of where they wed.


Pax!
User avatar
singgirl
11. Fish in the Bowl
 
Posts: 1368
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, US


Re: GLBT News

Postby Gatito Grande » Wed Jun 29, 2005 6:14 pm

"Families with both mothers and fathers are generally better for children than those with only mothers or only fathers," Calgary Bishop Frederick Henry said in a recent statement.


This is an utter lie, undisguised by the fact that the d*ckhead tried to paper over it by saying "generally": he's comparing "mother/father" families to single-parent families, not gay or lesbian couples. :mad

GG Nevermind "South Park", PRAISE CANADA! Out
User avatar
Gatito Grande
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2609
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Michigan


Re: GLBT News

Postby FineyMcFine » Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:24 pm

Two bills were just introduced in Congress before the July 4 congressional recess.

Clarification for Federal Employees Act
http://www.hrcactioncenter.org/campaign/bloch_urge

You know the whole Scott Bloch situation - he's in the Office of Special Counsel, a Bush appointee, and two years ago he removed all reference to sexual orientation from the OSC websites and has been refusing to investigate or prosecute claims of sexual orientation discrimination in the federal workforce since then. Federal employees are covered by a provision of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.

Anyway, this bill would clarify that OSC does have the authority to investigate/prosecute sexual orientation discrimination claims, and the action alert urges Reps to support it and to kick Bloch out of office if he doesn't get with the program.

Domestic Partner Health Benefits Equity Act
http://www.hrcactioncenter.org/campaign/dptax_senate_urge/

This bill would remove the unfair tax on domestic partner health care benefits that many corporations extend to employees. Currently the employee and the employer must pay tax on DP benefits as if they were income. It's a pain for employers because they have to keep two sets of books (one for opposite-sex married employees, one for unmarried employees who use DP benefits) and a pain for employees because they get taxed on this "imputed income."
User avatar
FineyMcFine
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: USA


Re: GLBT News

Postby Sheridan » Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:34 am

Practically at the same time as Canada the lower house of Spain's parliament approved gay marriage legislation, overturning a previous defeat in the upper house and meaning the legislation will now pass into law.
Sheridan
21. Geek Infested Roots
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:12 am


Re: GLBT News

Postby FineyMcFine » Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:42 am

Well, suprising everyone I think (except probably herself), it was Sandra Day O'Connor who resigned today and not Rehnquist.

Justice O'Connor was a good vote to have on the court for GLBT people, and the fight over her replacement is going to be difficult.

First step today: contact your Senators and cc: the President to urge a fair-minded nominee who will protect individual rights, freedoms, and legal protections including those for GLBT people.

HRC's Supreme Court Action Alert
http://www.hrcactioncenter.org/campaign/supreme
User avatar
FineyMcFine
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: USA


Re: GLBT News

Postby Gatito Grande » Fri Jul 01, 2005 2:56 pm

Yup: time to gear up.

You need to tell your Senators (Democrats, Independent, and possibly moderate Republicans, that is), early and often, to not be afraid of a "Constitutional Crisis" (as the GOP and their talking heads will surely characterize any resistance to a Dubya extremist). STAND YOUR GROUND, DEMS . . . Bush's numbers are tanking, and *most* Americans will be w/ ya.

GG Fight! Fight! Fight! Out

NB, to Sally McF: to urge activism, we also have this: Fighting Our Fight: the Gay Politics Thread
User avatar
Gatito Grande
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2609
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Michigan


Re: GLBT News

Postby Ben Varkentine » Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:14 pm

Here's the latest on Zach, the gay kid who is being kept against his will in a heterosexual "boot camp" in an attempt to cure his gayness. The web pages, blogs and message boards have put a lot of eyes on this program, and a lot of people have this kid's back. He's still there, with one week to go.

But guess what. He made the New York Times.


It was the sort of confession that a decade ago might have been scribbled in a teenager's diary, then quietly tucked away in a drawer: "Somewhat recently," wrote a boy who identified himself only as Zach, 16, from Tennessee, on his personal Web page, "I told my parents I was gay." He noted, "This didn't go over very well," and "They tell me that there is something psychologically wrong with me, and they 'raised me wrong.' "


Physical contact among clients other than a handshake is forbidden, and so is "campy" talk or behavior, according to program rules that Zach posted on his blog before he began at Refuge. Occasionally, recalled Jeff Harwood, 41, a Love in Action graduate who still considers himself gay, some participants would mock the mandatory football games.


(emphasis in the below quote is mine--Ben)

"Their identities are still in flux," said Dr. Jack Drescher, the chairman of the committee on gay, lesbian and bisexual issues of the American Psychiatric Association, which in 2000 formally rejected regimens like reparative or conversion therapy as scientifically unproven. "One serious risk for the parent to consider is that most of the people who undergo these treatments don't change. That means that most people who go through these experiences often come out feeling worse than when they went in."


-The above "snippets" per Tennessee Guerilla Women, a blog that's been on top of this:

http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/200 ... -from.html
Ben

House: "Another life saved by girl-on-girl action."
User avatar
Ben Varkentine
5. Willowhand
 
Posts: 316
Topics: 1
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:12 pm
Location: Seattle


Re: GLBT News

Postby FineyMcFine » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:32 am

Here's a link to the story, but I posted the full text below
Posted on Fri, Jul. 15, 2005

Gay-rights opponent Santorum stands by outed aide

BY STEVE GOLDSTEIN

Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - (KRT) - The senior spokesman for Sen. Rick Santorum, R- Pa., Friday confirmed to a web log that he is gay.

According to PageOneQ, an online gay and lesbian publication, director of communications Robert L. Traynham, said that he was an "out gay man who completely supports the senator."

Santorum, the third-ranking Republican in the Senate leadership has been an outspoken opponent of homosexual rights and a leading proponent of a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

Santorum, who was traveling in Pittsburgh, released the following statement:

"Robert Traynham ... is widely respected and admired on Capitol Hill, both among the press corps and among the congressional staff, as a communications professional. Not only is Mr. Traynham an exemplary staffer, but he is also a trusted friend confidente to me and my family. Mr. Traynham is a valued member of my staff and I regret that this effort on behalf of people who oppose me has made him a target of bigotry in their eyes.

"It is entirely unacceptable that my staffs' personal lives are considered fair game by partisans looking for arguments to bolster my opponent's campaign. Mr. Traynham continues to have my full support and confidence as well as my prayers as he navigates this rude and mean spirited invasion of his personal life."

Mark Rodgers, chief of staff at the Republican conference, which Santorum chairs, said, "Robert is a tremendous employee and we're all for standing by him." Traynham's homosexuality was not news to the senator or his staff, he added.

In the online interview, Traynham defended his decision to work with the senator. "Sen. Santorum is a man of principle, he is a man who sticks up for what he believes in. I strongly do support Sen. Santorum.

Asked whether he supported Santorum's views on lesbian and gay issues, Traynham told PageOneQ, "Sen. Santorum is a family man. I have been with him for eight years and I am very proud to be with him."

The two-term senator is up for reelection next year. His expected Democratic opponent is State Treasurer Robert P. Casey, Jr.

Traynham began working for Santorum since 1997 as a press assistant and then deputy press secretary. He was press secretary for the senator's 2000 reelection campaign in Pennsylvania. Just prior to becoming communications director in the Senate office, Traynham served as director of communications for the Senate Republican Conference.

Traynham holds a bachelor of arts degree in political science from Cheyney University of Pennsylvania, where he currently serves on the Council of Trustees.

In supporting the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would prohibit gay marriage, Santorum has equated homeland security with the sanctity of traditional marriage. He has referred to gay marriage as "messing with the basic family unit."

During an interview with The Associated Press two years ago about a challenge to the constitutionality of Texas's sodomy law, Santorum said that if the Supreme Court allows gay sex at home (which it ultimately did), "you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything."

On the marriage issue, Santorum also said: "In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be."

---

© 2005, The Philadelphia Inquirer.
User avatar
FineyMcFine
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: USA


Re: GLBT News

Postby Ben Varkentine » Mon Jul 18, 2005 12:13 pm

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/07 ... front.html

The lipstick lesbian daring to confront radical imams
by John in DC - 7/17/2005 10:12:00 PM


I went to a talk this woman gave in DC at the New America Foundation. Fascinating woman. And a really fascinating interview with her in the Sunday Times of London.

A snippet:
Irshad Manji has already been dubbed ‘Osama’s worst nightmare’ for her criticisms of Islam. Now she wants Britain’s Muslims to stand more firmly on the side of freedom.

No wonder Irshad Manji has received death threats since appearing on British television: she is a lipstick lesbian, a Muslim and scourge of Islamic leaders, whom she accuses of making excuses about the terror attacks on London. Oh, and she tells ordinary Muslims to “crawl out of their narcissistic shell”. Ouch....

Doesn’t the violent Muslim minority show Islam is flawed? “I ask myself the same question,” she grimaces. Far from regarding Muslims as oppressed they have a “supremacy complex — and that’s dangerous”. This, she contends, is true even among moderates. “Literalists” who consider the Koran the “perfect manifesto of God” have taken over the mainstream; and far from misreading Islam, as Tony Blair and the Muslim Council of Britain insist, terrorists can find encouragement for murder in the Koran.

The underlying problem with Islam, observes Manji, is that far from spiritualising Arabia, it has been infected with the reactionary prejudices of the Middle East: “Colonialism is not the preserve of people with pink skin. What about Islamic imperialism? Eighty per cent of Muslims live outside the Arab world yet all Muslims must bow to Mecca.” Fresh thinking, she contends, is suppressed by ignorant imams; you can see why she has been dubbed “Osama’s worst nightmare ”.

“The good news,” she insists, “is it doesn’t have to be like this.” She wants a reformation in Islam, returning it to its clever, fun-loving roots. “The world’s first ‘feminist’ was an 11th-century Muslim man. Baghdad had one of the first universities in the 9th century; the Spanish ‘Ole!’ comes from ‘Allah’; Islam even gave us the guitar.”
Ben

House: "Another life saved by girl-on-girl action."
User avatar
Ben Varkentine
5. Willowhand
 
Posts: 316
Topics: 1
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:12 pm
Location: Seattle


Re: GLBT News

Postby FineyMcFine » Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:13 am

Iran has reportedly publically hanged two teens for having gay sex. Warning: these pictures are a little disturbing.

http://direland.typepad.com/direland/2005/07/iran_executes_2.html

http://www.ncr-iran.org/content/view/222/69/

http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/07/072505Iran.htm
User avatar
FineyMcFine
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: USA


Re: GLBT News

Postby sam7777 » Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:32 am

I can't help but think that the fundies in the US would dearly like to do the same in the name of their god. I've seen those pictures as well and it is shocking and very sad to see the inhumanity.
sam7777
 


Re: GLBT News

Postby Gatito Grande » Mon Jul 25, 2005 5:49 pm

In the interests of full-disclosure, I have heard that the two young men being executed, were convicted (FWIW, in the Iranian justice system) of raping a thirteen year-old boy at knifepoint.

GG To me, this doesn't for a moment justify capital punishment (which I believe is ALWAYS wrong---especially for minors!), but I think we have to report the full-story (that, in this case anyway, the execution was not due, allegedly, to consensual sex) Out
User avatar
Gatito Grande
17. Mega-Witches
 
Posts: 2609
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Michigan

PreviousNext

Return to Board index

Return to The Kitten

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests


Powered by phpBB The phpBB Group © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007
Style based on a Cosa Nostra Design